Demitrios
Member
I'm not defending anything so much challenging someone who throws a comment out there that doesn't benefit anyone, like it's law. Granted I am excited about taking a look at this thing it's not exactly like I own stock in GSG. I understand what you're saying about me being incorrect with my definition, but by that same rationale is there any 1911 that's a TRUE 1911 anymore? Most have scallops on the side behind the trigger, almost none use a spur hamer anymore, many have a beavertail grip safety, etc. And keep in mind in 1931 Browning designed a .22 conversion for his 1911, which means the 1911 that shot .22's pre-dates many other rounds that the 1911 fires. Keep in mind, I'm only nit-picking here, please do not take this as me trying to start an argument, I only want to show my, and other, sides to this picture and I've no aggresive feelings while typing this.