Veterans Stabbed in the back by the NRA!

Status
Not open for further replies.

BLUEDOT72

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2003
Messages
15
Location
Southern Nevada
The Veterans Disarmament Act passed the Senate and the House
-- both times WITHOUT A RECORDED VOTE. That is, the bill
passed by Unanimous Consent, and was then transmitted to the White House.

The Veterans Disarmament Act has passed with the help of the NRA! The NRA has totally failed us here ! If I was considering which PRO-Gun organization to join now, It would not be the NRA! Wayne LaPierre and Chris Cox have let us down and they need to go! They have sold out to Chuck Schumer and we have let them do it!
The bill is being praised by the National Rifle Association and the Brady Campaign. What the bill does is to lock in -- statutorily -huge numbers of additional law-abiding Americans who will now be denied the right to own a firearm.

The efforts begun during the Clinton Presidency to disarm battle-scarred veterans -- promoted by the Brady Anti-Gun Campaign -- is illegal and morally reprehensible but Section 101(c)(1)(C) of this bill, HR 2640, would rubber-stamp those illegal actions. Over 140,000 law-abiding veterans would be statutorily barred from possessing firearms.

Organizations opposing this terrible legislation included The American Legion, Gun Owners of America and The Order of The Purple Heart!

If you are asked by new shooters if they should join the NRA, say "NO!!" Tell them to join the Gun Owners of America or any other Pro-Gun organization.
 
Have you actually read the bill or are you basing this rant solely on GOA's propaganda?

By the way, is there some reason this rant doesn't fit into the numerous threads already discussing this subject?

And as to joining GOA - I wouldn't give them a cent if they were the only "gun rights" group in existance.
 
I did a search
The only reference to a bill called The Veterans Disarmament Bill leads back to GOA
I'm betting that there is no such named bill

I have to ask myself why the organization would put out such a press release without giving a link to the actually bill and more importantly not even giving the real name of the bill

I have to also ask myself why someone would buy into the press release without actually checking the wording of the actual bill or at least knowing the name of it

If that person has done these things why would he not share with those he is trying to influence
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top