"To "reinvent/refashion/reconstruct" is to change what is already the 2A, as written. All the SCOTUS can do is "define" what is written. "
And who decided that os what "reinvent/refashion/reconstruct"
means?
I would call returning to the original intent a pretty big change at this point.
The 'collective right' theme has held sway in a number of circuits, so clarifying what the amendment means at this point could be a major change that would amount to "reinvent/refashion/reconstruct."
And who decided that os what "reinvent/refashion/reconstruct"
means?
I would call returning to the original intent a pretty big change at this point.
The 'collective right' theme has held sway in a number of circuits, so clarifying what the amendment means at this point could be a major change that would amount to "reinvent/refashion/reconstruct."