Loosedhorse
member
Let's see: if I were a Craig-type, I'd now fly into a rage about how "ignorant" and "uninitiated" you are since you've apparently not fired X-frames (at all?); about how you are claiming yourself superior in knowldege to the engineers who designed the X-fame guns, and to Peter Pi, who designed the .500 S&W round; etc. etc...."I do not have to lick a turd to know that I do not want to eat it".
But I'm not like that. So, instead I'll say: maybe try one sometime. Any of us will be happy to let you. You might be surprised--who knows?
Deductive reasoning, Craig, produced the Dark Ages. Experimentalism was what brought us out of them--the idea that we should take those "deduced" ideas that you come up with by reading and scribbling, and try them out on a range sometime.the gift of deductive reasoning
So, maybe "experiment" with a .460 sometime. If nothing else, it would at least give your bloviating criticism of all things X-frame more credibility, don't you think?
Craig, another thing you don't get--perfect Craig-line, by the way--is that it doesn't matter that that is your conclusion about .460 shooters, or that you came to that by "observation" (not how conclusions are arrived at, by the way).To come to this conclusion I use my powers of observation
What matters is that you decide to be impolite and disrespectful enough to tell us that we're stupid. Even if that is your conclusion, a nice guy would keep that conclusion to himself--you know, act high road. Maybe even use kind and gentle words, given his compassion for such stupid shooters.
Oops. Compassion. From you. I guess you can list another mistake in that "Loosedhorse" thread. Oh well.