WVGunman
Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2014
- Messages
- 382
Because I know everyone is going to immediately say "An AR-15," let me expand on this question. Let's say you really only could have a single firearm. May its because SHTF, maybe some other reason. But the circumstances are such that you will need this gun to survive, and you are NOT a soldier or survival expert. Caveats:
- You know you will have to kill at least some of your food, but you don't know what will be available. Therefore this gun must be capable of taking most types of game up to about 100 yards away: game up to deer sized, small fast animals, powerful animals, and flying animals.
- You don't know what threats are out there. It must be powerful enough to provide viable protection against predators, either large animals (like black bear), humans alone or in small groups of 2-3, or feral dog/wolf packs.
- Ammo availability is unknown. It must fire a round that can be scavenged or somehow acquired simply. Let's say a good shorthand for "acquired simply" is anything sold at Walmart.
- Must use ammunition that is light enough so several dozen rounds could be easily carried. Your ability to pack ammo is not unlimited.
- It must not easily break. The fewer moving parts the better.
- You have no cleaning supplies of any kind, so it must not require fancy cleaning. In fact, the longer it can go without cleaning at all the better.
- It can be operated quickly under stress and/or in the dark.
- It must have virtually zero chance of jamming, under all conceivable circumstances.
After considering all this, I think a double-barreled shotgun is the only gun that can do ALL the above equally well. Trade offs would obviously be made, but the point is universal versatility; it doesn't have to the be the best at anything, but it can't be the worst at anything either.The real deal-breaker for something like the AR-15 is maintenance. There's no such thing as barrel fouling with shotguns, nor is there rifling or a gas system to be clogged or worn down. With a double-barrel there's no feed mechanism or action to break, wear out, or jam. If a situation can't be handled by two quick shots, you probably were a goner anyway.
The real question then would be gauge. 12 gauge is obviously way better at handling large beasts, but a 20 gauge could still do the job (if just barely) and a lot more ammo could be carried.
Thoughts?
- You know you will have to kill at least some of your food, but you don't know what will be available. Therefore this gun must be capable of taking most types of game up to about 100 yards away: game up to deer sized, small fast animals, powerful animals, and flying animals.
- You don't know what threats are out there. It must be powerful enough to provide viable protection against predators, either large animals (like black bear), humans alone or in small groups of 2-3, or feral dog/wolf packs.
- Ammo availability is unknown. It must fire a round that can be scavenged or somehow acquired simply. Let's say a good shorthand for "acquired simply" is anything sold at Walmart.
- Must use ammunition that is light enough so several dozen rounds could be easily carried. Your ability to pack ammo is not unlimited.
- It must not easily break. The fewer moving parts the better.
- You have no cleaning supplies of any kind, so it must not require fancy cleaning. In fact, the longer it can go without cleaning at all the better.
- It can be operated quickly under stress and/or in the dark.
- It must have virtually zero chance of jamming, under all conceivable circumstances.
After considering all this, I think a double-barreled shotgun is the only gun that can do ALL the above equally well. Trade offs would obviously be made, but the point is universal versatility; it doesn't have to the be the best at anything, but it can't be the worst at anything either.The real deal-breaker for something like the AR-15 is maintenance. There's no such thing as barrel fouling with shotguns, nor is there rifling or a gas system to be clogged or worn down. With a double-barrel there's no feed mechanism or action to break, wear out, or jam. If a situation can't be handled by two quick shots, you probably were a goner anyway.
The real question then would be gauge. 12 gauge is obviously way better at handling large beasts, but a 20 gauge could still do the job (if just barely) and a lot more ammo could be carried.
Thoughts?