What should I do with this NIB Ruger MK2?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks great. Would be even better without all the muzzle drama but its your gun.
 
It's easily unscrewed and capped off. Like I said, I took the upper of my wife's gun. She likes the compensator.
 
It's easily unscrewed and capped off. Like I said, I took the upper of my wife's gun. She likes the compensator.
It helps keep the muzzle down. I like how they look, myself.

Even .22s have recoil, and comps work on them. I use them on mine, too. So there's a method to your wife's mayhem!

Not a bad looking gun.
 
Personally I'd shoot the hell out of it ,and then someday pass it down to one of your grandkids. I have a 22/45 RP and it a great reliable, accurate 22 pistol.
 
I saw a post, maybe here that indicated the Tactical Solution Pacsol uppers can peen in the area where the aluminum comes in contact with the steel firing pin. I doubt that is true, but have you or anyone had issues with these uppers? I have always been intrigued by them and and LGS has one for sale and I have been considering it. Thanks.
 
I saw a post, maybe here that indicated the Tactical Solution Pacsol uppers can peen in the area where the aluminum comes in contact with the steel firing pin. I doubt that is true, but have you or anyone had issues with these uppers? I have always been intrigued by them and and LGS has one for sale and I have been considering it. Thanks.
I did not, short term. After changing the lower to an alloy volquartsen, no such problem either.
But it is entirely possible in a random upper-lower combination
 
For target shooting heavier is better, easier to hold steady. The MKII with the taper barrel is a good base model to modify. Be sure to get a volquartsen trigger kit as well. You can always put the Ruger barrel back on if it ever becomes a valuable collector's item, or you change your mind.
 
True to an extent. The advantage of a heavier handgun is faster target reacquisition in rapid fire. In midrange slowfire, as included in the NRA rimfire match format, a lighter weight gun causes less muscle fatigue and tremor. Even the rapid fire would be only 5 in 5. It is good to have both uppers for different types of competition.
 
I had all the trick parts on my Mk II and it didn't make it better, just different. In fact, there came a point where it wouldn't even fire... so I took all the trick parts off and put the original parts back on and yay it works again.

Tom
 
The VQ sear and the Clark Custom hammer bushing and pin are really the biggest improvements that you can make on these guns.
 
I did not, short term. After changing the lower to an alloy volquartsen, no such problem either.
But it is entirely possible in a random upper-lower combination
So you are saying that if I just install the Tacsol upper on one of my steel framed MK II's that I could have problems with it? Thanks.

Edit: I did a little research on Rimfirecentral, and it seems some have had problems with the steel bolt impacting the aluminum breech face, but then I read where Tacsol has installed steel breech faces in the aluminum receiver, so now I am confused. From what I can tell, they do stand behind their product.
 
Last edited:
Tac Sol has proven itself. I think it can be trusted to match an intact steel frame. I've seen minor parts conflict while customizing my Ruger, but not with this particular upper.

Edit: just read your Edit. I can't tell whether the breech face in my upper is steel. It feels like an alloy when I scrub it. Honestly, the frame replacement made more difference than the barreled action, I'd invest in a lower first.
 
Last edited:
Thanks YZ, that is good info. However, my reason for getting one of these would be to just throw it on one of the several MK II frames I already own. Don't think I want to go the VQ frame route, but you never know.
 
You're most welcome. A stainless steel M2 frame may have a better trigger pull than a latter days' regular M3.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top