Keith
Member
I'm not clear on the situation here. Is only one of the three armed? If so, I'd shoot him dead.
As for legal technicalities, I'd argue that whenever some armed robber is waving a gun about, everyone present is in imminent danger. I mean, do you think the robber is going to make a formal announcement before he begins shooting? "OK, I'm going to begin shooting now - first YOU, then YOU, then the lady over there, then...". It makes no sense to wait until he shoots first.
I'll take my chances with a jury.
If all three are armed, that changes everything. Obviously, you aren't going to be able to engage all three without getting yourself, and likely some of the bystanders, shot.
Keith
As for legal technicalities, I'd argue that whenever some armed robber is waving a gun about, everyone present is in imminent danger. I mean, do you think the robber is going to make a formal announcement before he begins shooting? "OK, I'm going to begin shooting now - first YOU, then YOU, then the lady over there, then...". It makes no sense to wait until he shoots first.
I'll take my chances with a jury.
If all three are armed, that changes everything. Obviously, you aren't going to be able to engage all three without getting yourself, and likely some of the bystanders, shot.
Keith