Monkeyleg
Member.
Back in August of 2001, I started the Wisconsin Concealed Carry Association (WCCA), as well as our political action committee, the Wisconsin Concealed Carry Movement (WCCM).
After the November 2006 losses for Republicans nationwide, I thought it was time for our group to reorganize.
We did so on January 27th, with those present voting to change the name to Wisconsin Citizens for Personal Security. The name change was to take the focus from gun issues, and put the focus on the issues that we really stand for: personal safety and security.
We also elected a board of directors, something I've wanted for years.
The board would like to take the WCPS far beyond what I'd done with the WCCA. They'd like to do four-color mailings. They'd like to have polished speakers available to any group--from the Rotary Club to the VFW--ready with a great speech, and quick answers to questions.
They'd like to have a professional-looking website, and up-to-date information available on that site.
They'd like to have a lot of things. By "they," I mean the new members of the board. I've always wanted these things.
But these things cost money. The WCCA was always a low-budget grassroots group that did quite a bit of good with very little cash.
The new board has proposed that we offer various levels of membership: basic, volunteer (the more time you put in, the less it costs you), corporate or sponsor (give several hundred dollars, and be recognized, or be anonymous. Your choice).
These goals aren't to raise money. As I told the board at our last meeting, we must first decide what we're going to do, how much it will cost, and then figure out how to raise the funds necessary to meet those goals.. I despise groups that raise money without telling donors where their funds are going, or for what purpose.
Ok, another long-winded preamble to my point: how do you get people to contribute funds/membership fees to a state organization?
What do you think people need as some "token" to make them think their contributions are worthwhile?
In thinking about this as I type, I may have made a big mistake back in 2001 by telling people that everything was being done on a volunteer basis, and that there was no membership required. That structure---with donations of maybe a few hundred a month--worked fine for the political atmosphere we were involved in.
Now that the atmosphere has changed, I wonder how difficult it will be to get people to support the WCPS with real contributions.
Any insights are much appreciated.
After the November 2006 losses for Republicans nationwide, I thought it was time for our group to reorganize.
We did so on January 27th, with those present voting to change the name to Wisconsin Citizens for Personal Security. The name change was to take the focus from gun issues, and put the focus on the issues that we really stand for: personal safety and security.
We also elected a board of directors, something I've wanted for years.
The board would like to take the WCPS far beyond what I'd done with the WCCA. They'd like to do four-color mailings. They'd like to have polished speakers available to any group--from the Rotary Club to the VFW--ready with a great speech, and quick answers to questions.
They'd like to have a professional-looking website, and up-to-date information available on that site.
They'd like to have a lot of things. By "they," I mean the new members of the board. I've always wanted these things.
But these things cost money. The WCCA was always a low-budget grassroots group that did quite a bit of good with very little cash.
The new board has proposed that we offer various levels of membership: basic, volunteer (the more time you put in, the less it costs you), corporate or sponsor (give several hundred dollars, and be recognized, or be anonymous. Your choice).
These goals aren't to raise money. As I told the board at our last meeting, we must first decide what we're going to do, how much it will cost, and then figure out how to raise the funds necessary to meet those goals.. I despise groups that raise money without telling donors where their funds are going, or for what purpose.
Ok, another long-winded preamble to my point: how do you get people to contribute funds/membership fees to a state organization?
What do you think people need as some "token" to make them think their contributions are worthwhile?
In thinking about this as I type, I may have made a big mistake back in 2001 by telling people that everything was being done on a volunteer basis, and that there was no membership required. That structure---with donations of maybe a few hundred a month--worked fine for the political atmosphere we were involved in.
Now that the atmosphere has changed, I wonder how difficult it will be to get people to support the WCPS with real contributions.
Any insights are much appreciated.