Interesting.
From the article:
“In fairness, there is a doctrine known as “voluntary cessation,” which allows courts to hold onto a case after the defendant voluntarily quits whatever behavior led to them being sued in the first place. It’s a sensible doctrine, because it prevents defendants from endlessly avoiding litigation by doing something illegal, and then stopping their illegal behavior for just long enough for a court to dismiss any lawsuits against them.”
https://news.google.com/articles/CA...CoGCAow5YQBMJIaMIZF?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en
From the article:
“In fairness, there is a doctrine known as “voluntary cessation,” which allows courts to hold onto a case after the defendant voluntarily quits whatever behavior led to them being sued in the first place. It’s a sensible doctrine, because it prevents defendants from endlessly avoiding litigation by doing something illegal, and then stopping their illegal behavior for just long enough for a court to dismiss any lawsuits against them.”
https://news.google.com/articles/CA...CoGCAow5YQBMJIaMIZF?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en