New pistol

No it's much earlier, a 2nd model I believe but can't give you a date as my copy of Goforth's book is hiding somewhere. Anyway the cylinder rotation behavior you mention is normal for this one. Incidentally yours is a black powder revolver. Prolonged use of modern smokeless ammo will stretch the frame and loosen the latch.
 
No it's much earlier, a 2nd model I believe but can't give you a date as my copy of Goforth's book is hiding somewhere. Anyway the cylinder rotation behavior you mention is normal for this one. Incidentally yours is a black powder revolver. Prolonged use of modern smokeless ammo will stretch the frame and loosen the latch.
Well dang. That's nice to know. I wasn't told it was black powder by the seller. Oh well it's still a cool pistol. I don't plan on shooting it much anyway.
 
No it's much earlier, a 2nd model I believe but can't give you a date as my copy of Goforth's book is hiding somewhere. Anyway the cylinder rotation behavior you mention is normal for this one. Incidentally yours is a black powder revolver. Prolonged use of modern smokeless ammo will stretch the frame and loosen the latch.
Ser # is 273XX.
 
Revolvers aren’t pistols, technically. Pistols are semi-auto handguns, by definition.

Meh.

The etymology of the word "pistol" predates semi-automatic handguns by a number of centuries. While the pistols of those earlier centuries were also of a design which had "a chamber integral to its gun barrel", it also carried over to revolvers, both informally and formally.

While Webster defines it as having a chamber integral to the barrel, Oxford defines it as a small firearm designed to be held in one hand, which crosses to the Webster definition for handgun.

U.S. Patent 119048 "Improvement In Revolving Fire-Arms" also uses the term "pistol" when talking about revolvers:

"Be it known that I, CHARLES B. RICHARDS, of Hartford, in the county of Hartford and State of Connecticut, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Revolving Fire-Arms..."
.
.
.
"Figure l is a side elevation of the pistol with side cap and stock removed; Fig. 2, a longitudinal vertical central section of parts of the pistol..."


The English language is extremely complex, with a huge fraction of the words making up the totality of the English vocabulary having multiple definitions whose meaning is derived contextually. And context is convoluted too...there's context within the sentence structure, context in the subject of the writing or speech, context culturally, context historically, etc.

It's one of those things I don't sweat when people post using the word "pistol".

:)
 
Dave, that's not a new arm, that's an old one! I like old handguns, but semi-automatic .25 and .32 caliber arms. (Gotta draw the line somewhere.) I'm in favor.

"Pistol" referring to any handgun is a result of the change to the English language by sloppy speech. Much like "gay" no longer means happy and carefree.
 
As soon as I saw the title I just knew an old argument(?) / discussion would arise.

In today’s parlance pistol is one thing and the revolver is not a pistol.

I would bet if those that do not follow the Constitution wanted to ban “pistols” all of a sudden today’s definition would be just fine. ;)

Rather than argue with people I just call a revolver a “revolver” and a handgun where that chamber is integral to the barrel I call a “pistol”. Life’s too short for stuff like this.


So, @gasmandave Congratulations on your Iver Johnson. :D
 
Back
Top