Load starting points for some oddball plated bullets

Status
Not open for further replies.

loplop

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
547
Hello fellow THR'rs... I recently started reloading and in my local travels taking stock of reloading equipment I grabbed some boxes of cheap plated bullets from a shop. I didn't think to ask the owner (a handloader himself) what he uses behind these. Of course fast-forward to a Sunday morning, and he's closed. I was hoping to load up a few hundred today and wondered if anyone thought they might have a safe starting point.

The two things I recall from my discussion with the owner was "you can load them facing either direction" and "don't run them over 1000fps."

I have Unique, Bullseye, and 2400. I can load either 38spl or 357, although I think I'd stick with 38spl for these plated bullets. The flat one is 148gr, the rounded one is 150gr.

TIA for any suggestions. I checked Alliant's site and their reloading database is offline at the moment. My Hornady manual has 140gr and 158gr lead data only.

IMG_0472.jpg
 
They look similar to a double-ended wad cutter ... classic Bullseye match load for lead is 2.7 - 2.8gr of BE with the case lightly roll crimped over the top edge, ie. all the bullet is in the case. Some guys roll crimp into the last groove near the nose.

The wad-cutter bullets usually look the same at both ends - like a little beer keg. Are yours slightly tapered at the non-grooved end?

Odd bullet for sure - since you don't know the quality of the plating, I'd certainly stay with light, lead equivalent 38 Spl target loads.
/Bryan
 
When loading plated bullets you want to use lead data. I would go with 158gr lead data and begin with the starting load nothing higher. If you can't find your exact weight it is always better to use the data of the next higher bullet weight. You should try to make sure they are of the same dimensions and shape because of the baring surface to the bore of your firearm. I would feel very safe though using the 158gr lead data for these.
 
Interesting looking bullets. I would try a medium lead load to start with and work up. You do not have to limit yourself to lead data with plated bullets, just don't get carried away. Bullseye should work well. :)
 
Those bullets remind me of a reloading/shooting system that was around for a short time about 25 years ago. Only one I saw was 38 Special and it came as a package plastic reuseable cases, these heel type bullets that could be seated in the cases without any tools, cases were plastic with a metal head, sort of like shot shells, strictly low pressure and low budget. Had to use the cases only with these bullets. Poor memory!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Those things look like heeled bullets -- think 22 Short, Long, Long Rifle.

Are you sure which end points out of the case?

Never seen anything like that other than in 22 rim-fire.
 
They look like something you would find stuck in the ends of cheap Chinese curtain rods!

I bet there is an interesting story behind why they were made that way.
And I'd sure like to hear it sometime!

rcmodel
 
RC
So you mean to imply that all our lead and copper prices are being driven by a Chinese producer of cheap curtain rod finials?

Thank god they can (apparently!) double as bullets!
/B
 
Thanks for the suggestions, fellas. I believe I'll try the starting load for the 158gr SWC in my Hornady, which is 2.8gr of Bullseye. I'll use a very light crimp. I'll let you guys know how it goes :)

Canuck-IL: these are not tapered at the non-grooved end. .357 there. It's an odd shape.

MKL: I have no idea which end is supposed to point out; it looks to me like the flat point or round nose should point out. The owner of the shop loads the flat point ones with the grooved section outward, and the round nose ones with the round nose outward. He loads the round noses in 357. I think I'll stick with 38spl for now.

MMCSRET: I do believe you are EXACTLY CORRECT about the provenance of these bullets. They are made by "USAC" and the plastic cases are mentioned on the packaging. The owner of the shop has been loading and selling these in his reloads for years; he must have bought up all the leftover stock from the 80s!
 
BTW: the Hornady manual has some data for a 148gr wadcutters; set in the case farther than SWC (1.180" COL) the starting load of Bullseye is 2.1, max is 3.0. I could use this data, I assume, if I set the flatpoint nearly flush with the case lip?
 
MMCSRED is right. The bullets illustrated in the O.P. were made by USAC, Inc. specifically for reloading their PLASTIC .38 Specials.

The cases have metal heads for secure primer pockets and relible extraction, but a plastic web and tube. The plastic is much thicker than the brass of a regular case and is molded with an internal bead. The springback of the plastic is enough that resizing was not needed, just decap, reprime, powder charge and SNAP a bullet into place. No crimp, it was held by the internal bead in the grooves of the bullet's shank.

I have a box of USAC with ten rounds left and some of the empties, the rest handed out as novelties.

If the store owner has been loading them in brass cases, ask him how he does it. A normal cast/plated bullet load is not going to blow up your gun
 
I had some of these a while back. They were practice projectiles and the cases were plastic and were shot with only a primer as the charge. They let you practice in your basement or garage with a 22 caliber bullet trap.
 
I'm thinking you might have had CCI-Speer Target-38 plastic cases & bullets that were primer powered.

These are apparently lead bullets with plated jackets, and I strongly suspect a primer with no powder would only stick them in the barrel.

rcmodel
 
I forgot I had some of the rounds the owner makes up stashed away... He used to sell 38spl with a real light powder load for target shooters that my wife liked a lot in her Mod 36. I haven't pulled a bullet to inspect, but he does crimp them a bit with a standard crimp. As I recall (they were buried and it's been awhile since we've shot them!!) they used to keyhole out of her Mod 36 on occasion. I used to think the very light load, coupled with the short barrel, might be the culprit.

Now that I'm reloading, though, I'm wondering if it was the crimp.

Anyone think that setting these nearly flush with the case mouth (a la DEWC), running a starting load of Bullseye (as published in my Hornady, for 148gr DEWC), and just removing the bell (no crimp) would be the ticket?
 
Yep. Heeled bullets
I thought we had established they were USAC bullets, for use in USAC plastic cases?

Jim Watson said:
The bullets illustrated in the O.P. were made by USAC, Inc. specifically for reloading their PLASTIC .38 Specials.

IMHO: They have nothing at all to do with .38 Colt.

rcmodel
 
You are correct, RCModel; they are USAC bullets. Do you think my plan of action as stated just above is a good one?
 
I think I would probably load them as SWC & RN just as the dealer was using them.

I don't think the RN inside the case would give a very good gas seal.

And it's hard to guess where the center of gravity / center of pressure would be to determine which end will want to fly point forward.

Might just have to try them every whichway and see what shoots the best.

rcmodel
 
I never loaded or shoot any of them, I just had the componets. I still have them stached somewhere in the garage, or as my wife calls the indoor dump. One of these days I will have to clean it.
 
I remember that loading system used a gadget that looked like a hand exerciser to resize the cases. And IIRC you could size the case by boiling them in water. But I can,t/don't remember the name of the company
 
USAC is the name of the company :)

I'll load up some, shoot Friday, and report back if anyone's interested.
 
Well, for those interested... I loaded the non-rounded ones per Hornady's 148gr DEWC data. Set nearly flush with the case neck, 2.4gr of Bullseye (one load higher than starting load), CCI small pistol primers.

In my S&W Mod 27 these shot like 22's! Seriously, seriously weak. I had just shot a box full of 158gr magnums I loaded up, and I thought the first shot was a squib load. Unloaded the gun, cleared, checked, nope. It shot all right.

Anyway, once I settled into the super light load, it was actually pretty accurate at the 7-10 yards I was shooting today. I thought I was getting a bit of keyholing, but after sticking some shoot-n-c on my target to refresh it and test a group, it became clear I wasn't getting keyholing at all, but the WC's were failing to punch all the way through cleanly on occasion, a little trailer of target would rip out with the punched hole. LOL. Not much velocity on those little buggers.

Well, my wife would absolutely love these loads in her snub. I'll have her try some. Me, I want a clean hole in my paper, so I'd like a little more velocity. I only removed the bell I added for seating, I didn't crimp. I may try a light taper crimp next time. That should add a little velocity.

Until next time...
 
I should update this thread, if anyone's interested. For the second go-around, I loaded these with 2.6 and 2.8gr Bullseye, with a taper crimp on the brass (with a 38/9mm Hornady taper crimp die). The 2.8's in particular shot very well! At 25 feet they just made one big hole in the paper, at 75 I was able to keep them all on the shoot-n-c so that's pretty good for my skill level. Clean holes in the paper/target. Recoil was still just about nil, but it didn't give the feeling you had a squib every time like 2.4gr. :)

I liked them a lot. I loaded up another 50 this weekend, 2.8gr Bullseye again, this time with a light roll crimp.

A poster above asked if they were slightly tapered on the flat end... They are! I must not have measured all the way to the top, because they do indeed have a slight taper there. Very slight.

I should try these off a rest sometime at 75 feet, see how accurate they really are. I am planning on buying more (they are very cheap, $35/1000). I need to test the rounded nose one, as well, and see if those are any good. I bought 500 of each.
 
At $35/1000 I bet you hope there is a big supply. ;)

That's so last years prices. :D

:D my butt, :( is more like it. The cost of bullets these days that is. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.