CC/OC safety during a disarm.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Templar 223 notes:

I wonder if the OP here is worrying about a non-issue.

I've carried a gun for not quite ten years now and never once been asked to disarm.

That may be.

I'm in my 50s and nearly always lived in urban areas. I've never been a victim of crime nor directly observed a violent crime taking place. Can I conclude from that that carrying a firearm at all is a waste of my time and possibly even more dangerous to me than going without one?

regards,

GR
 
I'm a law abiding citizen. If we get to the point of disarming me ( BTW how does that make things safer for me) The cop already knows that I have CHP ( read safety class, fingerprint & background check) I'm not a felon & I'm not wanted for anything. So how does me being disarmed add to the safety of the situation?

In Alaska you don't need a CHP, so the cop has no idea if you are trained, have been background checked, etc...
 
If the officer asks to disarm you, I'd recommend taking the entire holster for safety reasons.

It's better for everyone involved if the trigger never has the chance to get fingered.
 
How about the LEO's realise they arent the only people who can handle weapons? I understand their concern for their safety. I have the same concern for my own bodily safety! In fact, I probably have more because I am not paid to stand in harms way!

However, just because you aren't a part of the "inner" circle of blue doesn't mean you dont know how to handle a weapon or be able to converse with LEO without fumbling your gun.

Jeff, you obviously feel that LEO is always in charge but I would ask why you think they should have carte blanche with your rights? I have the right to carry a concealed weapon. Period. They do not have the right to disarm because it makes him uncomfortable. Maybe my "blackness" or "gayness" would make them uncomfortable also?
 
stirthepot.gif


On the other hand, why should an LEO assumed that a suspected criminal is 100% safe with a weapon? If you're having a conversation with an LEO, you're most likely a suspected criminal. The officer doesn't know you from Adam; all he knows is that he has reason to believe you may have been involved in a crime. He may have just witnessed you commit a crime himself.

I realize that the majority of LEO encounters involve traffic violations, which are a far cry from violent antisocial behavior... but again, how is the LEO to know that you aren't the guy who's gonna snap? Disarming you might be demeaning and offensive to you, but I don't see how it's any kind of a surprise that it might happen.

And yes, I realize that my first paragraph is somewhat inane. But my point was to simply offer a different perspective.
 
I agree that he shouldnt assume a criminal is 100% safe with a weapon, however we have become so accepting of police overreacting because of the stress of their job! Repeatedly we see instances of shooting somebody 27 times or tasering them 8 times, etc etc.

Are the new generation of LEO unable to defuse situations without excessive violence? I remember the days of Deputies and Troopers that were expected to handle situations on patrol isolated miles from backup! Surely they found creative ways to handle situations!
 
I'm pretty sure the OP stated more than once that he did NOT want this thread to be about whether the detention is right or wrong or any other LEO bashing. It's about how to remove a weapon safely during a non-violent stop. That's it. Stop making it about other stuff, especially other stuff that has been discussed hundreds of times on THR already.


/Waiting for "Sans" to find this thread
 
Ok TOwner, if it is not a violent stop, why would the LEO want to remove your gun?

Maybe this has been discussed 100 times already, sorry that anybody could offer new insight into an old problem!

With your reasoning, the 2nd Amendment has been discussed enough, so let's quit talking about it!

To summarize your question/statement: There is no safe way to remove a weapon from somebody! That is an oxymoron of sorts! If there is not a violent encounter, there should be no reason to try to remove a weapon that is legally carried.
 
Maybe they should be teaching LEO's how to read people and situations instead of teaching them to use there tazer on an 8 month pregnant mother for not signing the back of a speeding ticket. If a LEO want's to come up to me and disarm because I might be a suspect or may have been involed in crime. So much for inocent until proven guilty.
 
Ok taurs that is understood, this went off topic in the 4th post then. I don't see in the OP where it asked who was in charge of a situation. End of story JW
 
Last edited:
Are the new generation of LEO unable to defuse situations without excessive violence? I remember the days of Deputies and Troopers that were expected to handle situations on patrol isolated miles from backup! Surely they found creative ways to handle situations!
A good and interesting question, and one I fear is likely to get the thread locked if the thread starts exploring it.
 
Tempers, please.

Tempers, please, gentlemen.*

There are, of course, many issues that could be discussed in connection with LAC/LEO interactions and stops/detentions. I think this particular thread will be most useful to everyone if we keep it focused on the main question, which is how to prevent an accidental shooting.

In case I did not make it clear, an assumption of the scenario is that nobody wants to shoot anybody. It does seem to me that there is at least a potential safety issue inherent in the situation.

Regardless of anything else, I think "No one gets shot" is agreeable to everyone, yes? I think even the hypothetical LAC and LEO could agree on that.

regards,

GR

-----------------------------
*And ladies, if any be present.
 
So let me get this straight, if the discussion gets too heated or in depth we just cut it off?
 
The only time I've been stopped while carrying (OC) it was the "keep your hands away from it" kind of thing.
The officer never thought that he needed it off of my belt "for his safety" but he didn't want my hands on it either.
That approach seemed good to me in that instance, but to answer the OP, in that scenario I would remove the entire gunbelt and holster. If I was CC I would say the holster should come off with the gun.
That's my opinion, thanks
 
Take the Bigger View

Captain 38 makes sense. That being said, none of my encounters with LEOs has resulted in a disarm. In every case, once they knew I was a CCW permit holder (and therefore a certified Good Guy), they relaxed and we had a nice chat.

And, I might add, in every case, I was sent on my way without incident but with thanks and a pleasant attitude. Nice.
 
Certified Good Guy

Thanks for the input Captain Mike....but I would be careful about using phrases like "Certified Good Guy", we've already been reminded that we are not God's Chosen Ones just because we have a permit!

Yes, we may have strayed off the original topic, but let's not stop the discussion. If we can argue these points amongst ourselves, it will certainly prepare us to better argue against the gun grabbers!
 
Complacency Kills Officers

The CCW holder has to understand that to a police officer, there are no guarantees that anyone is a good guy. I don't want to hear any crying about there being no guarantees that the cop is a good guy. That is 100% irrelevant and immaterial to this discussion. In most places you have no legal right to resist, and the chance of a cop encountering a subject who will flip out over a minor violation are much higher then a citizen encountering a criminal officer.

Officers die every year because they let their guard down when they shouldn't. I get very frustrated at the indignation some CCW holders feel when they think they may be asked to disarm during an encounter with a police officer. Many of those same CCW holders will come here to the Strategies and Tactics forum and state how they never let their guard down. Yet they seem to think that an officer should automatically let his guard down when the note that the person he is in contact with has a CCW shows up on the screen of the MDC. Treo, it's 0240, you are awakened by frantic pounding at your front door. A very disheveled appearing man is beating on your door and screaming to be let in. You arm yourself and go to the door. The man says I need to get in out of the rain and use your phone. You offer to call the police for him but he says, I need to tell them what happened myself. He holds up his state CCW permit. Do you let him in? Going by your logic he just passed the good guy test.

My point is that you guys routinely ask an officer to let his guard down in a situation where you, wouldn't, simply because you feel the officer should accept you as a good guy because you have a permit.

When an officer makes a contact often all he has to go on is what the computer spits out about the subject, his observations at the scene and his gut feeling. This is from a list of the 10 fatal errors that have killed cops:

4. Bad positioning. Never let anyone you’re questioning or about to pull over get in a better tactical position than you and your vehicle. Remember there is no such thing as a “routine” call or stop. You should always maintain a position of tactical dominance, regardless of who you’re dealing with or what seemingly mundane task, like issuing a speeding ticket, you are about to undertake.

5. Overlooking or ignoring danger signs. As a police officer, you will get to recognize “danger signs” like suspicious suspect movements, strange cars, warnings that should alert you to watch your step and approach with caution. Know your beat, your community and watch for what is “out of place”. When your training and instincts tell you something is wrong, trust your gut.


It's the gut feeling that will get a CCW holder disarmed. You shouldn't feel like it's anything personal or an affront to your manhood if an officer disarms you. It isn't, it's just the officer trying to safely do his job.

There are no certified good guys on the street. Not CCW holders, not other officers who are off duty. When an officer starts accepting that there are certified good guys, he's becoming a danger to himself and everyone he works with.

Jeff
 
C. Treo, it's 0240, you are awakened by frantic pounding at your front door...Going by your logic he just passed the good guy test.
.
You're comparing apples and oranges and you know it. First your panicing man contacted me, I didn't contact him. Second, he's acting in a manner that is accepted as dangerous. Third I'm acting as the gate keeper in my home I'm not the only person at risk .

To make your anology work a little better, I work as a security guard ( no where near a cop & I have no police authority) but I do have to interact W/ my clients employees & customers on a daily basis I am absolutely positive that interact W/ armed people every day. I would never consider asking one of them to disarm ( outside the scope of my duties anyway) I personally believe it's safer for all concerned if nobody touches a gun during the incident. & were I the cop that's how I'd play it.

In Colorado I'm not required to inform, so I don't ( with all the cop has to deal W/ why do I want to hand him ( or myself) one more problem to deal with?) so the cop isn't going to know unless I tell him. The only exception to that is if I'm asked to get out of the car then it becomes a safety issue for both of us. Again were I a cop I'd take into consideration that I had been told the person was armed, people that are looking to jump you don't show you their ace.
 
There have been some very arrogant comments made about who is in charge and how much power they have. Those are the kind of comments that start a thread jacking and give people the "should I trust" feeling. Being from a town of 400 people you sound like you deal with some pretty hardend criminals. I would think that a gut feeling shouldn't always tell you everyone is dangerous that sounds more like an assumption. Not to cry about it but there are bad cops yet I don't assume everyone of them is out to screw me, on that line of thinking maybe I should reevaluate my line of thinking. I do understand LEO's are in a dangerous line of work, they did choose this line of work and are getting paid for there time "serve and protect" I have had some very positive encounters with LEO and I in return am very positive back. It doesn't take much of treating, talking to someone like they are a lesser to sour a situation quickly.
 
I've only been disarmed once, while still residing in Indiana. I got pulled over for speeding. The LEO (agency is irrelevant) was very courteous (possibly b/c I was in my EMS uniform) and I greeted him politely and let him know I had a sidearm. He simply asked me where is was located (between my rt hip and center console between seat) and to slowly unholster it and hand it to him using only my thumb and index finger. He then cleared it, and at this point i'm not sure if he ran the serial # or just my CCW license but he returned it to me and after a minute of gun chit-chat, I went on my merry way. I'm sure a question of 4th amendment violation could be raised/argued, but as a LAC, I had absolutely no reason not to cooperate and oblige and left with a verbal warning (90+ in a 70) Also as a former LEO, I would understand that some folks wouldn't want to disclose their armed status, but at the same time, I always felt at ease when notified rather than finding a firearm during a patdown. Like Treo said, "people that are looking to jump you don't show you their ace." (that's twice i've quoted him now...we must think alike)
 
Treo,
My analogy is right on the money and you know it. The officer has made contact with the subject. He most likely has made contact to perform an enforcement action that may not leave the subject very happy with him. And you are asking that officer to accept the fact that at the time he got his CCW permit he had not been convicted of a crime and that said permit is a 100% guarantee that he is totally harmless to the officer and the fact that he has a firearm is immaterial when it isn't.

The subject the officer has contacted has most likely committed an offense of some type. That makes the situation very similar to the guy banging on your door.

Big Del,
I never worked in Alma, you have no idea what I've done and who I've dealt with, send me a PM with your personal experiences and we'll compare records.

As for gut feelings, you totally misunderstood my point which was if you have a gut feeling that something is amiss, it's best to act on it instead of telling yourself "the guy is a certified good guy, he has a CCW permit". The truth is there are no certified good guys and if you work on the assumption that there are, you are very likely to get hurt. Officers have been murdered by their regular customers, people they have dealt with for minor offenses for years and never been any trouble, so the officer gets complacent, cuffs in front, or maybe even doesn't cuff, doesn't search thoroughly or maybe not at all.

Anyone can go off when faced with a minor enforcement action like a traffic ticket. A few years ago we had a state supreme court judge go off during a traffic stop.

I am not advocating disarming everyone you contact. I am saying that if it doesn't feel right, you had better for your own safety. And I think that anyone with a CCW should accept that. If you went over to your neighbors house to discuss his dog doing his business on your lawn, and your neighbor came out with a baseball bat in his hand, would you ask him to put the bat down before you possibly pissed him off by telling him to keep his dog in his own yard? Would you think he's not a threat, after all, no rational person would get upset over such a request? The thing is, that you as a private citizen have the option to leave and call the same person who you don't want to hurt the feelings of a CCW holder by disarming him during a contact, to make the contact with your ball bat wielding neighbor for you.

Code3GT,
People that are looking to jump often do show you their ace....if you know what to look for.

Jeff
 
Duely noted, sir. I do agree with you that just b/c they're a certified CCW, they arent always the good guys. Situational awareness and that 6th sense plays a big role...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top