Shooter Progression

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nushif

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Messages
3,082
Location
Corvallis, OR
I don't shoot a lot around other people for some reason and wanted to see if my progress thus far as a shooter is about on par with what most people can expect. So I will post some images from today and ongoing when I go to the indoor range to check my progress using letter sized paper a small box and nine rounds.

I have about 20 hours of instruction, most of which is CCW legalities, gun handling (retention, draw from seated, standing, on back, etc) of which about three hours are actually live fire classes on targets and under pressure.

I will update this thread as I go to the indoor range.
 
Today's Results:

Rifle felt good, solid and all that, but pistol wasn't clicking. Definitely not at Zen today. Played around with trigger finger placement on the 1911, found out that very tip of finger is still better than the "standard" placement I've always been taught.

Here goes my first image:

2012-10-21_16-57-49_58.jpg

Here's the second one:

2012-10-21_16-56-14_34.jpg
 
On the handgun target:

1. How large is the square?...looks about 2"
2. Shooting one handed or two handed?
3. You mentioned 1911, but those holes look very small...is it a conversion upper or is my perception off?
 
Square is about two inches? 1.5? About.

Shooting two handed in each case at what I would call a measured pace. Pretty much shooting, letting the sights drop and then shooting again without any kind of rush, but a string of fire of 6 rounds is over in about seven (at the max) eight seconds.
As for why the holes seem small, I can assure you it's a .45, but I am using cheap-o reams of printer paper. Maybe something in how the bullet travels through it? It tears pretty much with every shot. I'd definitely call it the paper being anything but heavy target paper.
 
If you'd like to post a picture of your shooting grip, I'd be happy to offer suggestions

It is easier to work on one vector at a time...I'd start with the lateral dispersion first and try getting the group to move more toward the right. Just looking at your group, I think it is more than a trigger placement correction.

I think it might help...even at just 8 yards...to shoot at a smaller and more distinct target. Maybe a 1" dot that has been filled-in solidly. Even better would be a circle inside a 1" square, with the area inside the square, but outside the circle filled in. Rotate the square 45 degrees so that a corner is pointing down. Align the ears of your rear sight with the points on each side and bisect the circle with the top of the front sight blade
 
Even better would be a circle inside a 1" square, with the area inside the square, but outside the circle filled in. Rotate the square 45 degrees so that a corner is pointing down. Align the ears of your rear sight with the points on each side and bisect the circle with the top of the front sight blade

I like that. Gonna do that next time.
 
Get some 4" Shoot-n-see targets. That way all your hits will be visible from a distance. I'm also a fan of fiber optic front sights like HiViz. Reasonable cost and lets you pick up the front sight very quickly.
 
I recommend reading on technique and lots of practice. I'm still not a great shot, but I am better than I use to be.

Marksmanship is about replicating the same technique over and over again.

I've read alot of books on shooting technique, taken these books to the range, and refer to them while working on technique. Sure, some people stare, but then again, I can see my own improvement.

As for how you're doing, don't compare yourself to others. Compare yourself to yourself. Save your targets and refer back to them (write the details of the range session on there).
 
I like that. Gonna do that next time.
You can draw them on your computer and just print them up.

I have 12 spots on a sheet...4 rolls of 3 spots...that I use work evaluate issues I have while shooting. I just shoot one shot at each spot...at about 5 yards (15')...and look for the consistency. Shoot one roll at a time, it works best if you don't look at your target between shots

Shooting more than one shot at each target tends to hide your faults and you'll have a tendency to either correct or chase your previous shots.

I've found that there is little to be learned, when looking at the hits on target, when shooting more than 3 shots per string and almost nothing beyond 6 shots
 
Group size looks fine in order to defend yourself. Don't get too sucked into small groups being the ultimate goal. I see that happen a lot. Yes, there are times when this may be important. A 4" group IMO is the desired group size. From there I would slowly work on doing it quicker (be careful you don't do something unsafe) and/or at longer distances and keeping the group size at 4 inches. If you can get the groups tighter than that then increase speed and/or distance again. I'm a huge fan of Loui Awerbuck classes if he ever makes his way near where you live (he travels all across the USA). If possible, take a class from him and you will learn lots of useful stuff to help become more proficient and it will help separate lots of BS that flows on the internet.
 
I think you are doing alright, for being an "off-day". I have those too. Some days I shoot so much better than others, but the more experience I get, the fewer and farther between are my bad days. I agree that while striving for better groups is good, striving to shoot faster is also good.

If you have access to an 11x17 printer, you can use these pdf's I made awhile back. They can print on letter-paper too, but the dimensions may be a bit wonky.

If you print on an 11x17, without scaling for margins (just print "actual size"):

The big circle (Target2.pdf) is a 10" diameter, with thicker diamond lines (I don't know why, I always just focus better at them). I use this target sometimes for quick fires from low-ready (my range doesn't allow draw from holster) in quick succession from 7-10 yards, basically where I am just trying to hit within the circle (COM) but closer to the middle the better of course. Each concentric circle is 1/2"

The medium circle is 6" diameter, also with the diamond and 1/2" concentric circles. I shoot at this in a more controlled slow-fire manner. On most days I can keep an entire magazine within the 6" circle at 15-20 yards.

The four mini-circles are 2" diameter and I usually use them for my 10/22 but sometimes will shoot centerfire at them. Each concentric circle is 1/8" Sometimes it is fun to try to use only one shot to shoot out the 1/4" black dot in the middle, from 5-7 yards.

You can easily make your own targets however you'd like. Variety is the spice of life. These are just fun to try little games with. Sometimes I will hang one of each at 10 yards (it only takes one clip each), and do 2 quick shots at the big target, followed by a slightly lower shot at the 6" circle, followed by very slow aimed fire at the 2" circles.

I also love those shoot-n-sees and buy them frequently. They are great for seeing your shots out past 15 yards. I keep all the pasters too, because they are fun to just put up on a blank paper and try to pop it off with one shot at 7 yards or so.

Enjoy and I can't wait to see more posts!
 

Attachments

  • Target1.pdf
    11.4 KB · Views: 14
  • Target2.pdf
    6.6 KB · Views: 12
Both targets appear to be lit from the 11 o'clock position. Based on the high lights and shadows, the targets have been drawn on the backside, i.e. convex when they should be concave.

You do not describe how the shots were made, either offhand of from a rest or not, our whether the rifle has a score or not...

At the end of the day it doesn't matter what anyone else thinks, but you. You know from your own taggers and groups if you are progressing or not. Everyone progress and learns at different rates.
 
I can't begin to answer your question.

Why? Because I don't know the purpose of your "progression." What's your goal? Defensive effectiveness? Distinguished Marksman in NRA competition?

On the sliding scale of speed and accuracy, which end is more important to you?

Was any of this shot on the move? Was shooting from cover involved? Were you crowding that cover? And if bullseye is your progression, even those questions are completely pointless.

Also, beware of doing this. On any forum, you'll get guys that will see a decent group, and then tell you that you should be shooting a group half that sized. And it's not that these guys are just trying to be superior. Maybe they themselves shoot groups the size of a silver dollar at 25yds. But is that your goal? Maybe it takes them all day to do it.

I mean, I'm pretty confident that if I posted a video of me running a box drill or something, I'd get 80 responses here. 15 would be solid, experienced, informed critique of my shooting. 40 would be rubbish. 20 would be pointing out the obvious, and 5 would just say "looks good to me."

In my experience, the signal to noise ratio in attempting to diagnose/improve shooting technique on an internet forum is way, way out of whack.

If you want the right answers to this question, seek out quality training. Good trainers will see in a single string of fire something that would take an internet forum 40 pages of responses to flush out, and will do so with far less ... well... you'll just enjoy it more.

Now having said that, if you're going to go about this the hard way, THR is probably the better place to do it. Folks seem to be reasonably polite here.
 
There are far too many variables that you haven't presented here:

1) Your goals are what?

2) What was your shooting style? (drawing from a holster for speed, slow shooting for target accuracy, or shooting one-handed from a strong or weak side)

3) What are you shooting?


Honestly, if you want to get better I'd recommend a LOT of practice. This goes for anyone, and isn't a critique of your shooting (just your stated lack of experience). It's hard to just post a target online and expect it to be critiqued, at least not without a LOT of details. Even then, you'll find that many people have different goals. As was already mentioned, some guys aren't happy unless they can shoot a silver dollar at 50 yards with a pistol. But, many of those people are unprepared for defensive shooting, where speed and tactics overshadow pure accuracy.

Plan to shoot hundreds and then thousands of rounds in the course of your progression. Don't count on being a master with a pistol by shooting 25 rounds a couple of times per month... you might be able to do that once you've become experienced, but it takes quite a bit of practice to become truly proficient (I've been shooting for many years, and I'm still learning). Practice the fundamentals I hope you were taught in your CCW class, and try to find a balance between speed and accuracy if you're looking to shoot for defensive purposes. Also, try to find other people to shoot with, as it will be a better gauge of performance for you. If you don't know anyone who shoots, try attending some local IPSC/IDPA matches, or joining a gun club.
 
Short update!

My gun is off to be refinished right now, so no shooting for a few days.
As for what my goals are, well lemme elaborate.

I want to be a well rounded shooter who is both proficient at speed and in handling speed, but can deliver a "small group" given enough time. I'm not really worried about rifles, to be honest. I qualify expert or just shy of it every time I have to and am familiar with the rifle. My interest goes very little beyond that. Last class I took my time from concealment to aimed shots on target was 1.89 seconds. At seven yards though, my group size was a bit larger. I'd guess about ... six inches after 200 rounds?

How I practice:

Dryfire, a lot of it. Just for basic sight control.
I practice my draws in the living room.
I shoot mainly my CCO sized 1911 receiver with a .22 kit on top, but I did recently pick up a metric ton of .45 Auto, which I have been going through at a very nice clip and has been a very nice experience.

So no, I guess bullseye is out of the question for me at this point.'

But frankly here's something I've been wondering about. How come it's so unthinkable that someone can shoot both a small group given time and a decent group at speed? Are the skills really that incompatible? What is involved in either of these specialized disciplines that seem to make them so opposite?
 
Nushif said:
But frankly here's something I've been wondering about. How come it's so unthinkable that someone can shoot both a small group given time and a decent group at speed? Are the skills really that incompatible? What is involved in either of these specialized disciplines that seem to make them so opposite?
In short they aren't opposite, they both require the same trigger control. The problem is that people don't want to spend the time to learn correct trigger management and rationalize that larger groups are acceptable because they won't have time, when shooting under pressure, to sight and press the trigger. They are rationalizing and accepting a lower standard of accuracy, because it is boring to do it correctly.

What happens when you shoot faster, when using proper trigger management, is that you have to balance the speed you want with how fine a sight picture you need to make a hit. If you are shooting into a 6-8" circle, you don't need as refined a sight picture at 3 yards as you will at 15 or 20 yards. First you need to learn to place shots accurately, then you learn to see the aligned sights faster. You then use that perception to cue the final press on your prepped trigger.

I worked with a client one afternoon on shooting faster. She was already accurate, but just shot slowly. I changed her from using a Weaver to an Isosceles so that her sights would naturally returned to her original POA. We worked on resetting the trigger in series, rather than parallel, and then prepping the trigger. Posting a 2.5" x 2.5" pink Post-it note on the target at 3-5 yards, I told her to press the trigger whenever there was pink behind her front sight. She rattled off a 5 shot group at about 3 shot per second...not very fast, but about twice what she was doing before. I asked how she thought she did and she said she thought she pulled the 3rd shot out...did I mentioned that she is good at calling her shots.

She did pull her third shot out of the group a bit. It opened up her slightly larger than .5" group to about .75"
 
Here's another example of faster shooting with acceptable accuracy at a medium range.

Two targets have popped up at about 12 yards and the shooter needs to engage each with two rounds. The first two rounds have been fired, striking 2-3" apart, the slide has returned to battery, the sights are on the second target, and the next shot about to break...with the first two pieces of brass still above the slide.

TangBrass.jpg

I don't know how fast the shots were as this picture was taken in the middle of a stage at an IDPA match
 
Alright!

The gun is back from the refinisher and when I get the chance I will put up some pics as well, but for right now, here's another snapshot of a target. It's not much different or better than last time's, but the ironic thing is that right after .... I printed a tighter group going faster with just a white sheet of paper, so no reference point.

Today's target:

2012-10-29_14-52-17_269.jpg
 
I think it looks better controlled.

The lower 3 shots are likely anticipation or tightening of your grip...were they your later shots?

Did the one on the left get away from you?
 
The one on the left definitely got away from me, I could actually feel myself closing my eyes and just squeezing on that one. The low ones didn't particularly feel different, to be honest.

I placed my finger slightly more traditional as well on this one. More towards my first joint and less just the tip of the trigger finger.

[edit]
Actually let's be honest, I was seeing myself get sloppy on proper grip technique throughout the session and really had to focus again on good form and doing the right thing. Trigger finger placement was an experiment, but a tighter grip and better stance sure helped a lot, too. Time to go back to reading up on the basics, dryfiring and then shooting, no?
 
Be careful about which sources you are using. Techniques in shooting, two-handed and more rapidly, have improved through testing in the competition arenas.

Even something that was gospel 20 years ago is now less than optimal
 
Another day at the range!

My rifle was my trusty Nylon 66, my pistol was my CCO with an Advantage Arms kit.

UPxqY.png

Rifle felt good, today, don't know what was different, to be honest.

G7C1G.png

Handgun felt a bit more controlled, as well, which is to be expected since it's a .22 now. I do get stage fright with the gun though at this point when I shoot these targets, since I managed pulling a slightly better group before this ... again.
 
Last edited:
I did make some changes:

I am trying to truly find that sweet spot on the trigger thus far. I tend to either go all the way to the tip of the finger, but with my body symmetry somehow that points the gun very far left when I draw quickly.
So I tried going to a more traditional finger placement, slightly inward of the "swirl." I'm getting used to it, but it's not there quite yet.

Not to mention it bears saying that when I put on the conversion kit the gun usually isn't zeroed well. I'm not sure that matters much at these distances, but if in doubt I am (in my case as well) more inclined to look at shooter error than pistol error.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.