Note the last paragraph. It aint' just guns and it ain't just the USA (like you didn't know that).
from http://www.cctv.com/english/20070430/103358.shtml
The Parker decision contains an interesting opinion -- that gun registration for purposes of the government knowing what guns are available for military service does not violate the Second Amendment.
That raises an interesting hypothetical. Suppose SCOTUS reviews Parker and makes a clear...
We're all familiar with the debate over whether the RKBA, and by extension the 2nd Amendment, covers nukes and other WMDs. I don't want to rehash that debate (please don't :) ), but it does raise an interesting question:
If the RKBA covers any weapon, does it cover objects that can become...
From the New York TImes -- heavily slanted against us, but also some good stuff:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/17/magazine/17wwln_essay.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
You folk who live in up in New York (especially NYC) might want to contact your local press outlets and put a stop to this lie that's not only spreading, but morphing into an even worse lie in the hands of the press.
Yesterday, in support of Mayor Bloomberg’s anti-gun activity, Children's...
Initial post deleted by cuchulainn
Story from the St. Petersberg Times deleted by me (cuchulainn) because Lou629 is correct.
I acted just like an Sarah Brady, didn't I -- using a tragedy to make a political point. :(
Thanks for the prod back up to the High Road, guys.
Recently, I've read a lot anti-gun statements in newspapers pointing to this old bumper-sticker maxim as "proof" that the NRA doesn't "get it."
To be sure, the saying is an over simplification (though true). The problem is that if the NRA ever used it, they haven't done so in decades. I...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.