Search results for query: *

Again, so says a socialist subject of California. Maybe in your Hollyworld, but not mine. So, are you taking up CCW's slack, 'cause he can't hang? Are you his 'lap dog' or do you have your own agenda? Btw, 'throwing the Kong for the dog"? Is that some form of Kali beastiality? You folks...

So says a citizen of the socialist state of California. Btw, how in the world would me posting from a prison computer(which I'm NOT) mean I'm NOT blowing hot air? You folks in kali sure take things out of context( probably why y'all're in so much trouble). I'll try to speak s-l-o-w-e-r, it...

RMC said: "Well, I'm neither a lawyer nor a cop, maybe one or the other will come along and help out, BUT, it may be called "Felony Menacing", or "Assault with a Deadly Weapon", or something else, depending on the location." "which don't look good 'cause I think you just committed at least...

RMC said" ".....which don't look good 'cause I think you just committed at least one, maybe two, felonies in any state in this union. " Really, and what'd they be? I see a man , who I don't know walk within spittin' distance of me and I see he's carrying a gun and I don't know him and I...

pipsqueak(?) said:"Am I understanding you correctly? You, as a private citizen, are going to draw down on somebody in the Quik-e-mart because he tells you to MYOB? " You're understanding what you want to , but I see right away you're attempting to take it out of context and I'm gonna guess...

CCW said:"There is only one way to see it." Says who? Don't you see you're just as bad as 'the supremes' (whoever that is)? You're dictating that there's only ONE way to see it and everyone who disagrees is with 'THEM'. The 2a says the people have a right to keep and bear arms, but it was...

CCW said: "It's really pretty simple." Yes it is, so why try to make it so difficult? Of course you know( or maybe you don't ), the Constitution allows that the American society may pass laws to apply to any given era or time frame and as you know(maybe you don't ), Congress introduces...

Realgun said: "Make of the "we" question what you will." Typical slippery answer. YOU said 'we', why'd I attempt to speculate who you meant, which is why I asked. Let me be more specific, when YOU said 'we', who did YOU mean when YOU said 'we'? I think maybe 'we' might be a minute group of...

quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This Admin stops many , many attempts on a regular basis, but 're too busy to inform you, regardless of what you think. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------...

RG, whose this "we" you're refering to? Also, didn't the US Attorney General declare that the 2A meant individuals , as apposed Komrad Reno's interpretation that it meant only militias?

Article III. (of the Constitution) Section. 1. The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices...

Hmmmm, should I have to undergo a background check before I can practice the religion of my choice or before I can write an article in the press? __________________ Another ridiculous statement that only lends to make mockery of this thread. If you can cause harm to another human being...

"Read me off 2a again and show me where it excludes criminals." This is too ridiculous to respond to. I proved my point, you haven't proved yours. The 2A is not the entire Constitution, where it says that criminals lose certain rights. So I'm right, this is going to boil down to individual...

CCW said: "I just ask....read me off a federal weapons law, then read me off 2a and then justify the federal weapons law. Sorry. It's real simple. This is not rocket science. We all know that the constitution is the supreme law. This is a gun forum. It is expected that you would understand...

"here is my question.......How do you as a civilian feel that the govt and its enforcement arm can reconcile it's oath to protect, serve, follow or whatever the constitution and then run one of us in for a "Weapons Violation" , a Gun control crime or, other wise, is it right or wrong?"...

GG, exactly WHOSE hearts and minds should we be trying to win? Seems to me the rest of the World should be trying to win OUR hearts and minds, or we all forget about this whole heart and mind thing, 'cause so many Countries are So different and have their own problems, most'd just as soon not...

OO- said:"When it comes to gelatin tests and calculating stopping power, I have yet to find a cartridge that won't stop a block of gelatin." I know this is OT, but this just blew me away. OO, super kudos! "...we now return you to your regular scheduled thread."

"Put simply, what Rick told the judge is effectively identical to the Watt situation, in which case the US Supreme Court's holding in that case applies to Rick." Mr March, with all due respect, I find it interesting that you'd make this statement. The distinction here'd be the ability to...

We can settle this real quick, does anyone have the 9/11 report? Does it say, on pg 135 in chapter 4, what the NR says it says?

Chris Rhines said: "Why is it that some people really want to live their lives afraid, when there is nothing to be afraid of? And why do they insist of throwing away their liberty (and mine) is exchange for a worthless promise of protection against a non-threat?" Ahhh, you're mistaking...