Why were they confiscated during the riots?
Because they were on humans rioting? Adding to the commotion?
If so, why would we expedite the return of their firearms over any other time a firearm is confiscated for criminal activity?
If they are in fact some kind of professional, or even amateur, security company, they will have other arms. I am a carpenter, I have more than one hammer.
If a single “hammer” is too much for them to lose, they should seriously rethink being in the private security business.
Who were securing? Where was this person, and why were they out in a time of Marshall Law?
Or were they out roving as a pack of scary looking guys?
But I’m not sure why it was written in the first place. The whole article is a farce. No one will corroborate any detail. Plenty of he-said,she-said.
Why would they? “Mayor’s office” hiring vigilantes, cops ignoring duty because of a business card,
the government wanting to give back firearms.
It reeks of Saturday morning cartoon.
It’s so ridiculous, it’s probably true…