•••44 cal WADCUTTERS•••?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I cast and shoot Saeco 944 44 cal, 200 gr, wadcutters in my 44 Special. It is similar to the Matt bullet having a wide grease groove and a crimping groove at the top.

They shoot well in my 44 Special revolvers.
 
Interesting. I usually stick with the 240gr LSWC myself. What would be the gain to these?
I load wadcutters at a target or slightly higher level for my "XX" Special revolvers. It makes for nice, easy shooting ammunition for a day of plinking. They cut nice round holes in the targets.

I have moulds for 32, 38, 44, and 45 caliber wadcutters. (I need to get a 41 caliber wadcutter mould:))

For 44 Magnum and 357 Magnum, I load semi-wadcutters loads at levels a bit higher than the Special levels for a bit more "oomph" but not at wrist snapping recoil levels. Nice loads that chamber a bit more easily for the quick follow up shots.

A semi-wadcutter bullet at similar velocities as the wadcutter loads would work just fine. It all depends on meeting your desired goals for your ammunition.
 
Last edited:
I use the 250 grain full wadcutter from Matt's. In a well used but functional .44 Hand Ejector (I'm told the same model used by Elmer Keith in pioneering the .44 Magnum) as an alternate defense arm. I use Power Pistol propellent at less than maximal loads. Not a 'full' load, but not bashful, either. Accuracy is at least suitable for self defense; I've never worked with it at ranges of over 25 yards.
 
First is a Lyman 429348 185 gr.
2nd is a sorta new one from Matt’s bullets 200 gr.
Anyone compared these two styles in a shoot test. One more accurate than the other? Thanks in advance
View attachment 1089258 View attachment 1089259
The top one is designed to be loaded like a traditional SWC and not nearly flush with the case mouth like a WC. It will be easier to chamber, but leave more air space in the case. Depending on the powder used. Could be useful for hotter loads that need the space. Probably intended for lever guns that can't feed WC seated at the case mouth.

The bottom one is designed to be seated almost flush with the case mouth, a traditional WC.

The second one will be the safer bet for ultimate accuracy, but the first might be better for general purpose. It will likely come down to the individual gun.
 
Last edited:
I welded up a Redding seater plug and machined it flat for my Redding Competition seater for .38/.357 Mag. I use it to seat everything from nearly flush WCs in .38 Spl to 158 Gr SWCs in .357 Mag, no round nose bullets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top