1895 Nagant Question?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nothing wrong with a Single Six in .32. I've got one myself. But it's not double action. Nagants aren't for everyone, to be sure.
 
In the Nagant's defense, it was designed as a service arm, so it is capable of defense/offense against humans.

That said...
*'50's newsreel accent*
"There have been important developments in firearms technology since 1895"
:D

TCB
 
Thanks alot Cosmoline I agree with you.And really liked the picture,problem solved!Don't want to reload?Buy another Nagant and keep it loaded too.Will for get the .32 idea and stick with the factory ammo.
 
CraigC said:
So was the Colt SAA .45. Which would you rather depend on?

me said:
That said...
*'50's newsreel accent*
"There have been important developments in firearms technology since 1873"

Updated; my point remains valid nonetheless. Also, I thought .45LC was developed for horses, or was that .45ACP?
 
.45 Colt was developed to be powerful enough to put down a horse as a means of stopping a mounted enemy in shooting at a larger target than its rider.
Denis
 
So was the Colt SAA .45. Which would you rather depend on?

I'd prefer to rely on an arm not noted for a propensity for blowing the users genitalia off if dropped.

A Taurus 85 is so much better suited to any of the criteria that makes the OP even consider a nagant and if used can probably be had for significantly less money.

The days of $250 s&w 38's are over. For those of you not plugged into the RIGHT NOW gun market s&w wheelguns are shooting through the roof right now. Especially snubbies. If you're finding $250 dollar 38's my advice is to buy it and log onto your closest Facebook gun trader group and double your monies
 
I'd prefer to rely on an arm not noted for a propensity for blowing the users genitalia off if dropped.
Oh please, nobody with half a brain carries a traditional single action without the hammer down on an empty chamber.
 
don't forget the nagant has a significant advantage over classic american revolvers: it has SEVEN chambers, so when your adversary says 'you're empty mister' you still got one up yours. :D
 
Anemic round, miserable double action pull, slow to load and unload, large....

There are better choices--many of them.

Agreed.
I will say however make no mistake it may be a lot of things but it will "Kill", but no not the best choice.
 
Why is the guy in the photo carrying what appears to be linked 8mm Mauser ammo?

And I'd personally reduce the grenade collection in favor of a spare PPSH magazine. Of course, we can't see his right side. Probably has some more grenades hanging on his belt..and two more Nagants.
 
IMHO, you'd be better armed with a quality .36 or .45 percussion revolver than a Nagant. The DA pull on the Nagant is heavy enough to be unusable, so it's effectively a single action for most shooters. The ballistics of any of the service-sized percussion revolver will be better than the 7.62x38R.

Now, I'm not actually suggesting that you choose a percussion revolver as a truck gun, since good police trade-in S&W Model 10s and 64s are available. But if Id been russian officer and had to trade in a S&W No.3 "Russian" for a Nagant, I would not have been happy.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.
 
Diary Entry:
Today I agreed with Guillermo.
This does not often happen.
Denis
 
Today I agreed with Guillermo.
This does not often happen.

don't feel too bad Dpris...

someone will start talking about how Pythons are fragile and you will say "ditto" and I will start quoting Massad Ayoob...

Or someone will bring up MIM

put another way...fret not...all will be back in order soon.

:neener:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top