This is probably an old topic, but I've noticed most new 1911 style pistols have the flat mainspring housing and long triggers like the original 1911 while only a few "milspec" reproductions have the arched housing with short trigger like the 1911A1. I know that some of this is personal preference. It seems the flat/long cofiguration must be much more popular than the arched/short configuration since most new production and custom pistols are built that way.
Since the arched/short of the 1911A1 was supposed to be an ergonomic improvment over the flat/long of the 1911 (many decades ago), this is a little confusing. Were these improvements of the time due to a small group of military brass getting what they wanted or was the average size hand smaller at that time just as average height and weight?
I have examples of both and can't decide which I prefer (doesn't matter too much to me). It does seem the flat is a little more comfortable but the arched seems to provide a more secure grip.
Since the arched/short of the 1911A1 was supposed to be an ergonomic improvment over the flat/long of the 1911 (many decades ago), this is a little confusing. Were these improvements of the time due to a small group of military brass getting what they wanted or was the average size hand smaller at that time just as average height and weight?
I have examples of both and can't decide which I prefer (doesn't matter too much to me). It does seem the flat is a little more comfortable but the arched seems to provide a more secure grip.