Nice choice! I like the grips.
I wanted the Target model for the trigger and sear adjustment, but NEVER liked the looks of the round bbl.
Idea was to get one and put a slab side bbl on it.
But my eyes got old and mandated an optic so went w the Contour bbl so I could use the Targets full rib.
Could have got a slab side and Weigand top rail but the Target has a rail so only needed a diff bbl. No blued ones in stock so got the stainless.
No biggie, can get it coated later.
For an iron sighted Buckmak, slab sided is the looker IMHO
As far as I can tell, mechanically the same. I’ve had 2 Rugers, MKIII 5” barrel, which was a pretty good gun, and a 22/45 Lite, which I finally got rid of after 2 trips back to Ruger- it was a jam-o-magic, they could never fix it. Then bought a Buckmark Hunter, 7 1/2 barrel, beautiful wood grips, accurate, very well balanced. Stock trigger was better than both Rugers by far, I did a little work on it myself, the spring ‘flip’ and Tandemcross trigger and some polishing on the sear, now at 1.7 lb trigger pull, I love this gun! Much more reliable than either Ruger- it seems to eat anything.
Love the slabsided Buckmark, now if they would make it in 7 1/4 barrel. The slab sides are a beautiful gun!Thank you for posting such great pics, I've decided even the "plain" versions look good!
It's been so long since I've shot my brother's Buckmark I couldn't tell you which version it was, but IIRC it's similar to CoalCrackerAl's. I do remember it fit me well and since then I've had the bug.
Anyway, thought you might want to see what I settled on....
View attachment 1088893 View attachment 1088894 View attachment 1088896
View attachment 1088899