"20 reasons to ban guns"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Juna

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
980
Here's the Link

20 reasons to ban guns..... Flawed anti-gun liberal logic

1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, & Chicago cops need guns.

2. Washington DC's low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis' high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.

3. Statistics showing high murder rates justify gun control but statistics showing increasing murder rates after gun control are "just statistics."

4. The Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban, both of which went into effect in 1994 are responsible for the decrease in violent crime rates, which have been declining since 1991.

5. We must get rid of guns because a deranged lunatic may go on a shooting spree at any time and anyone who would own a gun out of fear of such a lunatic is paranoid.

6. The more helpless you are the safer you are from criminals.

7. An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 Magnum will get angry and kill you.

8. A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.

9. When confronted by violent criminals, you should "put up no defense - give them what they want, or run" (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don't Die - People Do, 1981, p. 125).

10. The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns & Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery.

11. One should consult an automotive engineer for safer seatbelts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for internal medicine, a computer programmer for hard drive problems, and Sarah Brady for firearms expertise.

12. The 2nd Amendment, ratified in 1787, refers to the National Guard, which was created 130 years later, in 1917.

13. The National Guard, federally funded, with bases on federal land, using federally-owned weapons, vehicles, buildings and uniforms, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a "state" militia.

14. These phrases: "right of the people peaceably to assemble," "right of the people to be secure in their homes," "enumerations herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people," and "The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively, and to the people" all refer to individuals, but "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" refers to the state.

15. "The Constitution is strong and will never change." But we should ban and seize all guns thereby violating the 2nd, 4th, and 5th Amendments to that Constitution.

16. Rifles and handguns aren't necessary to national defense! Of course, the army has hundreds of thousands of them.

17. Private citizens shouldn't have handguns, because they aren't "military weapons'', but private citizens shouldn't have "assault rifles'', because they are military weapons.

18. In spite of waiting periods, background checks, fingerprinting, government forms, etc., guns today are too readily available, which is responsible for recent school shootings. In the 1940's, 1950's and 1960's, anyone could buy guns at hardware stores, army surplus stores, gas stations, variety stores, Sears mail order, no waiting, no background check, no fingerprints, no government forms and there were no school shootings.

19. The NRA's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign about kids handling guns is propaganda, but the anti-gun lobby's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign is responsible social activity.

20. Guns are so complex that special training is necessary to use them properly, and so simple to use that they make murder easy.
 
#21 - The more rounds a gun can 'carry' (with a mag) the more 'deadly' it is.
#22 - All Assault guns (those that resemble military weapons) should be banned because they appear to be more deadly and have more potential to kill more people.

:D
 
I like to call "Assult Weapons" HDW Homeland Defense Weapons or Homeland Defense Rifles"

It makes them sound kinder and gentler. Just they way all the liberal nut jobs want the world.

That is a great post and agree 110% with it should be a sticky.
 
Well, I've never seen the list before, and it's awesome. Thanks.
 
6. The more helpless you are the safer you are from criminals.

That reminds me of Pippin's line to Treebeard in 'The Two Towers': "The closer we are to danger, the further we are form harm." It makes no sense to me either...
 
#23 Gun campuses that are gun free are really crime free as well, however VT and other countless school shootings still occur.
 
"I like to call "Assult Weapons" HDW Homeland Defense Weapons or Homeland Defense Rifles" "

Bad idea, because then the antis will want you to join some kind of state sponsored defense force to own one.

I like sports-utility rifle best.
 
Do you think Columbine or Virginia Tech would have happened if teachers were allowed to pack heat after passing a basic gun safety class? Just wondering...
 
"8. A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet."

I have actualy heard this one argued before.:banghead:
 
It's funny how the Democrats say they want gun control to "make the streets safer", but when they ban handguns and many other types of guns in DC and the crime and murder rate triples, they don't get rid of the law. But they're just "trying to take care of us".:barf:
 
Washington DC's low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis' high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.
0 out of 100 senators were shot last year...
see, gun control does work for those it was designed to protect! :neener:
Seriously, does anyone really think that the D.C. gun ban was put in place to protect "the people?"




Any woman who carries a firearm would just have it taken away and used against her... but she'd be perfectly able to defend herself by placing her keys between her knuckles and scratching her attacker's face.

Any woman who carries a firearm would just have it taken away from her by a criminal... but the same criminal will not be able to pry the cell phone from her hands as she dials 911.

The police don't need guns because they could easily take away a criminal's gun and use it against him.

If a criminal is trying to kill you in front of your family, is it really acceptable to escalate the violence by using a firearm on him?
 
0 out of 100 senators were shot... see, gun control does work for those it was designed to protect!

You think those laws apply to Senators? I doubt it. The Washington elite are seldom affected by the laws they pass for the rest of us to live under.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top