I'm suprised that you had such a problem with the S&W .22 revolver. The good old 317 "Kit Gun" (alloy frame, 3 inch barrel, adjustable sights) would be my first choice for your indicated usage.So I am back searching for a accurate and reliable 22 to carry in my flying survival vest.
Was the .22 Airlite you got rid of a 2 inch, or 3 inch gun? Did it have adjustable sights?
23 ounces, cheap, reliable and accurate.
At my age I have found that I am now very far sighted. Suddenly 29 inch rifle barrels make sense.
So I may need to get something that I can mount with a pistol scope or a red-dot type sight.
One thing I sincerely wish for is getting rid of the stupid ban on shoulder stocks
The answer is yes and no. They went after Thompson-Center who sold a receiver with stocks and barrels for both pistol and rifle in one package, and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Thompson-Center.Is that strictly true? Maybe I am not up on this because I haven't paid much attention to this particular part of the law, but can't you legally own the carbine kit for the Beretta NEOS? I thought that if it was originally bought and "registered" as a pistol, it was OK to put a stock on it and vice-versa.
Is that strictly true? Maybe I am not up on this because I haven't paid much attention to this particular part of the law, but can't you legally own the carbine kit for the Beretta NEOS? I thought that if it was originally bought and "registered" as a pistol, it was OK to put a stock on it and vice-versa.