Nice. Are these rare now days? I want a reliable, decent .380 without breaking the bank. Looking at a S&W Bodyguard.I have quite a few .380s but for a softer shooting manageable recommendation take a look at the Remington RM380. It's aluminum framed double action with a true slide lock, a slide that is very easy to rack, mag release from both sides, slim with absolutely nothing to catch on clothing. With the flat base magazine I get a good two finger grip while with the magazine finger extension, I can get a full three finger grip. Capacity is 6 +1 rounds and it has shown itself to be very tolerant of ammo type or brand feeding everything I've tried flawlessly.
The flat base magazine is on the blue frame.
View attachment 1047459
Nice. Are these rare now days? I want a reliable, decent .380 without breaking the bank. Looking at a S&W Bodyguard.
As we get further and further down into the little guns, especially with someone who has little training or experience, I dont agree. These are not guns for beginners and/or the inexperienced. Very often, even experienced shooters dont do all the well with them.
I think a lot of those people who carry these things would be better off "without" the gun, as that way there is less chance they would do something stupid because they have it, and they actually think they are armed and prepared because they do. And no matter what the gun is, suggesting that they carry them unloaded just makes it even worse and no sense.
These types of guns are not "primary" guns, and many of them arent even good as a backup. Yet, they seem to be pushed pretty so hard on those who shouldnt be using them. And a lot of those people probably shouldn't carry a more realistic gun either. Just "having" a gun doesn't make you armed.
I think a lot of the problem here is, we have different levels of user/carrier knowledge and experience and the mentalities that go with it. The more the experience and training, the lower on the list the smaller guns go as a primary choice.
What Ive never understood too is, if I feel the need to take "a" gun with me to the store for a late-night run, why wouldn't it be the same gun I carry all day, and gives me the best chance at coming out ahead, should I need it? Makes no sense to me to do otherwise. If Im going to need it, Im going to need it, and Ill want the one that gives me the best shot at it.
I've said this time and again when as a Firearm Instructor or as a private citizen don't "just drop something in my pocket 'cause I'm only going to the store". Carry a gun every time as if your life depended on it.
I also have the S&W BG and it is my second most carried .380.
The RM380 though is much softer shooting, harder to control under stress and slower to return to POA for second shots. In addition, the slide on the BG is several orders of magnitude harder to rack than the RM380. The BG came with one magazine while the RM380 came with two.
Here are the two in question shot sitting on top of my Sig P290-RS for size comparison.
View attachment 1047688 View attachment 1047689
Also note the mag release on the right side of the RM380. In that photo there was some skateboard tape on the BG slide to help with racking. After about a year's use I no longer needed the extra grip on the slide.
No, Mea Culpa, easier to control.
Hey, I'm old so get off my lawn!
Maybe if your hands are weak.
I do find the Bobcat slide manageable even with the hammer down while my Taurus PT-22 Poly is simply impossible for me to rack if the hammer is down.I have developed shooting pains in my hands related to 40 years of turning wrenches (and I need to put in at least another 10 on the job). The strength is still there, but pain will make me lose my grip on occasion. From what I've heard and read from my predecessors, my situation isn't unique.
One thing is for sure, a little Bobcat slide requires a stiffer set of springs to hold back .22 LR than a heavier slide on a Ruger MK/Buckmark/S&W Victory. Probably why the Bobcat and its kin have the tip up barrel, for folks that can't move that slide fully well.
I have developed shooting pains in my hands related to 40 years of turning wrenches (and I need to put in at least another 10 on the job). The strength is still there, but pain will make me lose my grip on occasion. From what I've heard and read from my predecessors, my situation isn't unique.
One thing is for sure, a little Bobcat slide requires a stiffer set of springs to hold back .22 LR than a heavier slide on a Ruger MK/Buckmark/S&W Victory. Probably why the Bobcat and its kin have the tip up barrel, for folks that can't move that slide fully well.
Back to the Bobcat . . . I really did like plinking with mine back in the day. It was extra satisfying when I'd actually connect with soda cans with that little gun.
I do find the Bobcat slide manageable even with the hammer down while my Taurus PT-22 Poly is simply impossible for me to rack if the hammer is down.
Being a DAO gun, does that mean you are starting the hammer back with the trigger?
No, it means I just can't manually rack the slide on the PT-22.
I forgot about that tip up barrel. My short term memory is showing.
In case you want to watch.Good to hear the RM380 is overall an easier shooting gun.
Now if someone will start making them again!