renaissance
Member
This is amazing ( to Me at least )
I have a Dillon Toolhead (650) that I set up some time ago to load .38 spl
I think that the bullet I used was a Hard Cast Lead Truncated Cone in 158 grain.
Went to it today because I was out of 38 Special.
I found three partial boxes of .38 Spl bullets, all in 158 Grain Hard Cast Lead
They Were:
National Bullet Truncated Cone
National Round Nose Flat Point
“B&J” Round Nosed
Using the ToolHead as set up I tried building a cartridge with each of the bullets.
The one same Toolhead Setup:
Put the crimp into the crimping groove of ALL THREE of the bullets
( center of the groove in the Truncated Cone
Bottom end of the crimping groove in the RN and RNFP)
I then measured the “height” of each bullet and the OAL of the finished cartridges
Results follow:
OAL Bullet Shape Bullet Height
1.408 RNFP .645
1.452 TC .695
1.470 RN .686
Subtracting the bullet heights from the OAL of each cartridge I can calculate the Combustion Volume ( measured in terms of "length of cylinder") in each cartridge
RNFP 1.408 -.645 = .763
TC 1.452 - .695 = .757
RN 1.470 - .686 = .764
The are for all practical purposes ……THE SAME !
I can use the one same toolhead setup and any of the three bullets, interchangeably………
If the powder charge is the same ( and it will be in my 650 )
All three substantially varying bullet shapes should behave the same.
Is this a coincidence, or did the designers of these bullets know what they were doing?
Placing the crimp groove so as to yield the same combustion volume.
I am curious to know what the shape of my bullet seating stem is ………….
That it will seat all three bullet shapes just right so that the crimp grooves come out at the same height on the case mouth…….but –
I do not want to queer the set up.
I have a Dillon Toolhead (650) that I set up some time ago to load .38 spl
I think that the bullet I used was a Hard Cast Lead Truncated Cone in 158 grain.
Went to it today because I was out of 38 Special.
I found three partial boxes of .38 Spl bullets, all in 158 Grain Hard Cast Lead
They Were:
National Bullet Truncated Cone
National Round Nose Flat Point
“B&J” Round Nosed
Using the ToolHead as set up I tried building a cartridge with each of the bullets.
The one same Toolhead Setup:
Put the crimp into the crimping groove of ALL THREE of the bullets
( center of the groove in the Truncated Cone
Bottom end of the crimping groove in the RN and RNFP)
I then measured the “height” of each bullet and the OAL of the finished cartridges
Results follow:
OAL Bullet Shape Bullet Height
1.408 RNFP .645
1.452 TC .695
1.470 RN .686
Subtracting the bullet heights from the OAL of each cartridge I can calculate the Combustion Volume ( measured in terms of "length of cylinder") in each cartridge
RNFP 1.408 -.645 = .763
TC 1.452 - .695 = .757
RN 1.470 - .686 = .764
The are for all practical purposes ……THE SAME !
I can use the one same toolhead setup and any of the three bullets, interchangeably………
If the powder charge is the same ( and it will be in my 650 )
All three substantially varying bullet shapes should behave the same.
Is this a coincidence, or did the designers of these bullets know what they were doing?
Placing the crimp groove so as to yield the same combustion volume.
I am curious to know what the shape of my bullet seating stem is ………….
That it will seat all three bullet shapes just right so that the crimp grooves come out at the same height on the case mouth…….but –
I do not want to queer the set up.