.30 Carbine better than 5.56

Status
Not open for further replies.

MP-44

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
406
When using modern HPs in the .30 Carbine vs FMJ in the 5.56?

Last paragraph

http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-722135_ITM

COPYRIGHT 2001 Publishers' Development Corporation

SHOOTERS SEEKING A HIGH-PERFORMANCE TACTICAL CARBINE WITHOUT A HIGH-TECH PRICE TAG ARE REDISCOVERING THIS VERSATILE, VINTAGE FIREARM.

Police agencies and armed citizens need a good long arm to supplement their handgun for defensive purposes. There are very few situations where a person is better off defending himself with a handgun than a good long gun, if the latter is available.

Here the definition of long gun is a shoulder-fired weapon like a rifle, carbine, submachine gun, assault rifle or shotgun. There is a readily available, often overlooked long gun that is superb for this purpose that can out-perform most of its high-tech, expensive competition -- the M1 carbine.

In recent years the traditional shotgun has been losing favor with both police and civilians for defensive use. The reasons for this include excessive recoil, a high degree of proficiency in operation, potential collateral damage from the buckshot pattern, and the limited effective range with buckshot.

In answer, many departments, individual officers and armed civilians have turned to semi-automatic rifles or carbines in either pistol calibers or .223 for use as tactical long guns. Some law enforcement agencies have turned to submachine guns.

All of these guns offer improved ballistic performance and practical accuracy over a handgun. However, none of the pistol-caliber carbines or submachine guns are nearly as effective as the old and often unfairly maligned .30 Ml carbine.

With proper ammunition, the M1 carbine can easily compete in effectiveness with .223-chambered weapons out to at least 150 yards, and few police or civilians have any business shooting at anybody farther away than that.

In addition, the M1 carbine weighs only 5 1/2 lbs., making it a pound or more lighter than most of its competition, including even the pistol-caliber carbines, and considerably lighter than many like the UZI submachine gun at 8.8 lbs. or the M16A2 at 7.9 lbs.

Born Far Combat

The M1 carbine has many other assets as well. It has superb reliability under the worst field conditions. Its accuracy exceeds that of virtually all the pistol-caliber carbines and submachine guns on the market and is comparable with that of many of the semi-automatic .223 rifles.

Another huge advantage for the M1 carbine is that, unlike most modern firearms, it has pre-ban high capacity 15- and 30-round magazines readily available in quantity at very modest prices. The same holds true for spare parts and accessories.

Ballistically, the M1 carbine's little .30 Carbine cartridge packs about 2.5 times the kinetic energy of a standard .45 ACP or 9mm load fired from a pistol. This is solidly in the energy territory of the .44 Mag. revolver. Indeed it has only 90 ft./lbs. less energy at the muzzle than the Russian 5.45x39mm cartridge and is only a little farther behind the .223 when fired from 14.5" or 16" barreled carbines.

Options And Tactics

Although a cartridge's muzzle energy is not the sole criterion for measuring its effectiveness, it is a good indication of the cartridge's potential if it is loaded with properly designed expanding bullets. With military-type FMJ bullets, the .30 Carbine will drill right through car bodies and such.

This capability is highly desirable to police officers in many situations. When the .30 Carbine cartridge is loaded with expanding bullets, its effectiveness as a manstopper increases exponentially. One police unit used M1 carbines loaded with JSPs in several shootings. They found the carbines to be extremely effective. Quoting one of their more experienced officers about the results from shootings with a .30 Carbine using expanding bullet ammunition, "We never had to shoot anyone twice."

Out to at least 150 yards, the .30 Carbine cartridge usually makes a more serious wound than does the .223, .308 or .30-'06, when the latter are used with FMJ bullets. It is also greatly superior to any of the common defensive pistol rounds fired from a handgun or carbine, even when the latter uses hollow point ammunition.

Even the FMJ .30 Carbine load is far more effective than is commonly thought. After interviewing many veteran M1 carbine users from World War II, Korea and Vietnam, we found that the vast majority of these soldiers found the M1 carbine to be quite effective even with GI ball ammunition.

One former Marine who saw extensive combat with the MI carbine in the Pacific in World War II was quite emphatic that the little gun and its cartridge were effective in the close-range combat that he experienced. He also stated that he greatly preferred the M1 carbine to the Garand for that type of fighting because of its much lighter weight, shorter length and higher magazine capacity.

First-Hand Experience

Another veteran M1 carbine user interviewed was a U.S. Army Special Forces adviser in the early days of the Vietnam War. He had advised indigenous units armed almost exclusively with M1 carbines, and used the gun extensively himself in combat. He stated that the M1 carbine was very effective in the jungle combat that they typically experienced. Interestingly, he said that when M16s eventually replaced the M1 carbines, he found that the new gun offered little if any significant advantage in effectiveness over the older M1 carbines.

Probably the most authoritative account of the effectiveness of the M1 carbine in real combat comes from the superb book Shots Fired In Anger by John George. George served as a company grade officer in World War II in the famous Merrill's Marauders, operating behind Japanese lines. George was a highly experienced and successful service rifle competitor, shooter and hunter before the war, so all of his writing is from the perspective of someone highly knowledgeable about guns.

The M1 carbine was his primary weapon in the Marauders. The light weight of the carbine and its ammunition made it ideal for troops like the Marauders that carried all their supplies and equipment with them and were re-supplied by airdrops. His book covers several instances where he personally used or observed M1 carbines employed with great effect.

George reports, "The M1 carbine turned out to be the ace weapon of the war, as far as I am concerned. It was light and handy, powerful, and reasonably accurate ... The cartridge was powerful enough to penetrate several thicknesses of helmet, and to perforate the plates of the Japanese bulletproof vest, which would only be dented by .45 auto slugs. It was flat shooting enough to have practical accuracy at more than 200 yards ... For many types of offensive fighting, such as sneak raids and infiltration tactics, it was often superior even to the M1 (Garand), penetration being the only point of difference."

Full-Auto Follies

Late in World War II a selective-fire version of the M1 carbine was introduced as the M2 carbine. These saw little use in World War II, but were extensively used in Korea. Many of the accounts about the ineffectiveness of the .30 Carbine round come from improper and ineffective use of the M2 carbine on full auto.

Typically, the soldier or Marine dumped an entire magazine on full auto at a charging enemy with little or no effect. The probable truth is that in most instances it was ineffective because he simply missed. When firing the M2, if the first shot does not hit, none of the following shots will hit either, because the weapon will quickly climb off target, particularly with a long burst. The idea that anyone could absorb a magazine full of .30 Carbine bullets through the chest and keep coming is a myth born of bad shooting.

One must remember that these accounts are all about the M1 or M2 carbine using standard GI hardball ammunition. When this weapon is used with modern expanding bullets, its effectiveness against soft targets is increased considerably. One of the best .30 Carbine loads is the Winchester HSP. It is very accurate, feeding and expanding superbly and reliably.

A Cost Effective Warrior

An important asset of the Ml carbine is that two or three M1 carbines can be purchased for the price of one AR-15 or MP5 submachine gun. An affordable M1 carbine is worth more than all the expensive state-of-the-art rifles that you do not have when you need them, because you cannot afford them.

Something else in the Ml carbine's favor compared to all the submachine guns and rifles based on military assault rifles, is that it is relatively innocuous looking. Police do not like to be perceived as storm troopers, and the M1 carbine is much less likely to cause that impression than an AR-15 or an MP5,

The Ml carbine is too good a gun to be overlooked. Several hundred thousand of them are in circulation in the U.S., and many can be purchased at very reasonable prices. Israeli Arms International (IAI) and Springfield Inc. are currently offering excellent M1 carbines made to GI specifications using surplus military M1 carbine parts. Many more surplus Ml carbines are standing offshore, waiting to be imported into the U.S. under a favorable political climate.

For defensive fighting purposes typically encountered by police and armed civilians, an AR-15 or one of its better clones is perhaps preferable to the Ml carbine, if both are used with expanding bulleted ammunition. However, the Ml carbine with expanding bullet ammunition is more effective than any .223 rifle loaded with GI handball or any submachine gun or semiautomatic pistol-caliber carbine on the market. The Ml carbine is that good!


COPYRIGHT 2001 Publishers' Development Corporation
 
I wish it was less costly than a basic ar but not enough if at all for me to worry about ether one. Pretty much the same price range as a mini-14 and about as good on the range. I would even look at a lever gun.
 
look at the year it was published. That long ago ar15's were banned and even for LE they were pricy compared to cheap m1 carbines. This article is so far out dated that its kind of funny to read.
 
Everyone likes pictures.
a CMP early Inland, refurbed by the DCM, with Ultimak base and Z-point. With softpoint ammo, extremely fast and efficient on critters and soft targets. The base and scope barely add any weight to a handy little rifle. By the way, it is more accurate than my AKM 7.62x39.
DSC05280.jpg
[/IMG]
 
The M2 was standard issue for me during occupation duty in S.K. in '54/'55. I used to "liberate" a 600-round canister from the arms shack and go down to the shore at Inchon and mess around at low tide. Shoot seagulls and seashells and such. I never had any problem controlling full-auto fire. Or with an M16, either, fast-forwarding some 25 years...
 
I have an AR and an AK. My CMP Inland is my goto HD longarm.
I prefer how the Carbine handles, it's weight, and I think the 30 carbine soft point load is plenty for self defense. Let's see you buy a basic AR these days for the price of a service grade CMP Inland...$495.
 
I don't think an M-1 is as reliable a feeder as an M-4 round for round, but I think it is a heck of alot easier to get back into action. I have 45 years with the M-1 and 42 with the 5.56 BTW.Also while it might be the ballistic equivalent within 75 yards, after that the 5.56 is way better.
 
" look at the year it was published. That long ago ar15's were banned and even for LE they were pricy compared to cheap m1 carbines. This article is so far out dated that its kind of funny to read. "


I was more interested in the last paragraph.
 
Even if its an old article a lot of its stands true. It's handy, light, packs a whallop and is cheaper (and sometimes more available--see ammo shortage scare) than 223/5.56. It doesn't 'look' as evil and if short range is your need, it's a pretty darn good choice. I'd choose soft point over hollowpoint for reliable feeding and make sure you practice with it. No rifle is the 'one true sword' if you don't practice.
 
Is the article correct in stating that the .30 Carbine with expanding bullets is a better man stopper than the FMJ 5.56 ( within HD range )?
 
" look at the year it was published. That long ago ar15's were banned and even for LE they were pricy compared to cheap m1 carbines. This article is so far out dated that its kind of funny to read. "


Gee, I don't remember ARs ever being banned. You could still buy them, but without colapsable stocks and flash hiders. All the gun makers did was change a few features and go right on selling them, and the public kept right on buying them. Magazines of all capacities were relatively available throughout the 'ban' period. It is nicer now with the ban over, because we have ARs with more features.
 
Whoa! Timely Intel.

I recently found one of the new Auto Ordnance (Kahr) M1 Carbines in the used rack at my local Gander Mountain at a substantially discounted price. I picked it up & immediately thought how handy it would be for my wife to use at our rural home for dispatching all types of "pests". It's light, simple, inexpensive, reliable, light-recoiling & doesn't carry quite the "Assault Rifle" stigma associated with my AR. And, because it's a newly-produced model, I wouldn't be subjecting a fine (valuable) WWII collectable to wear & tear. I think Winchester is still currently producing .30 Carbine ammo (X30M1) specifically designed as a reliably-feeding, effective (soft point) SD/HD load. And I know Mrs. Ghost Tracker isn't going to shoot at anything that's not; <75 yards away, a threat to pets/livestock/grandchildren or...coming in the door/window of our home. Sounds like a good match.
 
To get another Inland in the same condition as my heirloom Inland would probably cost $700 or more. It's in great shape, mostly because my grandfather did very little with it for many years before he died. He was also a professional machinist and woodworker, and knew how to care for things. It is my wife's primary and my backup to my shotgun for HD. I find it to be the perfect medium when a pistol is too little and a rifle may be too much.

Having said that, I don't know if I would ever have gotten around to buying one if I hadn't inherited it. The rifles have gone way up in price, the ammo certainly isn't cheap when you can find it.
 
I was more interested in the last paragraph.

A soft point 30 Carbine round at the kind of up close and personal ranges normal civilian defensive shootings take place at is definitely going to not do a bad guy any favors at all. For a gun that's going to be employed inside 25 yards, the poor ballistics and trajectory of 30 Carbine aren't as much of a liability as they'd be for a gun expected to go 0-300 or further.

I'd be interested in hearing some real data on terminal ballistics between JSP 30 Carbine ammo and high quality 5.56mm rounds (TAP, etc.). The officer he quoted who said "with 30 Carbine we never had to shoot anyone twice" just tells me his team didn't shoot many people :rolleyes:, though I suppose it's no more nonsensical than the stories about 30 Carbine not penetrating Chinese winter coats in Korea :rolleyes::rolleyes:.

I like the M1 -- handy little gun. I think that for an ergonomic fighting rifle, the AR has it beat in a lot of ways, though.

Seems like I saw adds a few years back for some company that was making a 30 Carbine upper for the AR, which would, I suppose, give the best of both worlds for those who feel like 30 Carbine is a better CQB round.
 
How far ( without extremes ) is the difference between HD and murder?

Within that distance is the expanding .30 carbine more effective than the rounds that our guys in uniform ( a big thank you to those guys & gals ) are using on the BGs in those distant lands? It's comparing apples to oranges but after reading that statement I am really curious if there was any data to support it.

Does Evan Marshall have any data on this? I figured someone here would have this stuff memorized:p
 
.30 carbine ammo is no longer cheap. its at least as expensive if not more so then 5.56 so that puts a black mark on owning them.
 
Perhaps, but the .223 with an expanding bullet is better than any .30 Carbine load ever made.

Go over to brassfetcher.com and look up .223 and .30 carbine. Close range results appear to give the .30 carbine the nod.

Corbon's loading a 110 grain DPX bullet in .30 carbine and I hear rumors that Hornady may come out with a 110 grain XTP for loading in the carbine. Both should make excellent competitors with the .223 out to 100 yards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top