pbearperry
Member
Korth
The Korth was made for people who need status symbols.It does nothing a S&W ,Colt,or Ruger can't do.
The Korth was made for people who need status symbols.It does nothing a S&W ,Colt,or Ruger can't do.
While I agree with the general principle that the Korth is overpriced and probably at least half the cost is purely to puff up the egoes of the rich and shameless. However, there are some of us who appreciate finer fit and finish than is typically exhibited in your average S&W, Colt or Ruger. We just typically buy custom guns, FA's and USFA's. It has nothing to do with "status".The Korth was made for people who need status symbols.It does nothing a S&W ,Colt,or Ruger can't do.
Try Egun.de. I bought dozens of Korth revolvers there at prices ranging from 1,000 to 2,500 Euros. To me, this price is justified by their unsurpassed quality of manufacture. All steel parts of Korth revolvers are ground, polished, and differentially hardened. By contrast, Smith and Wesson no longer even bothers to machine the firing systems of its revolvers, resorting to the tawdry expedient of injection molding. Willi Korth claimed that his revolvers maintain their accuracy after 50,000 full power .357 Magnum rounds. For those who doubt his claim, here is a testimonial pitting a Korth revolver against a vintage forged S&W M28:So, you don't like Freedom Arms, for some unstated reason, Smiths are garbage, etc. Okay can you post pictures of your Korth's and tell us where we should go to buy them at a 'competitive' price against whatever is out there? Or is there nothing out there? Please respond since I need to tell Hamilton Bowen and others to close up shop as they are out of the competition.
Please note that the frame size of the Korth falls between those of the K and L frames in the S&W lineup. And yet it withstands the pressures of heavy .357 Magnum loads much better than the S&W N frame. This factor alone warrants its premium price.I mentioned the strength of the metal in the Korth as well as the care of the hand fitting. I began some tests of the Korth vs. the M28. At the beginng of the tests the barrel to cylinder gap of the Korth was just over .0025 while that of the M28 was .003. With just under 200 rounds of heavy hunting loads through both guns the barrel to cylinder gap of the Korth was where it had begun for all cylinders. The M28 however had opended up and varied from .003 to .004. The S&W showed wear and some additional gas cutting on the frame above the barrel from some hot .125 grain loads. The Korth showed no significant wear.
It has nothing to do with "status"
Yeah, okay, whatever. Keep right on believing that if you like
one with an IC choke and one with a MOD choke?
You have made your point. Now apply it at home. Your earlier claim that "S&W is far better" should be qualified by noting that S&W lacks comprehensive single and double action trigger weight and stacking adjustments built into every .357 Magnum Korth revolver, and that the latter will unfailingly digest ten times the number of full bore Magnum rounds that will irreparably damage the former. Suum cuique.You appear to think that if a gun will throw pellets downrange it's perfect and cannot be improved upon.
And yet it withstands the pressures of heavy .357 Magnum loads much better than the S&W N frame. This factor alone warrants its premium price.
If you mean the Ruger Redhawk .357, I suppose that it can be as durable as a Korth, given that it weighs half again as much. Consider that a 4" Korth Combat revolver weighs 1016g, whereas a 6" Sport model weighs 1175g, as against the much less rugged 4" and 6" S&W 686 weighing in at 1191g and 1298g, respectively. Can Ruger support the same claim in the frame size splitting the difference between the S&W K and L frames?Ruger could make the same claim, but they're not charging the same price.And yet it withstands the pressures of heavy .357 Magnum loads much better than the S&W N frame. This factor alone warrants its premium price.
You cannot "tune up" a stretched frame.As far as the durability of the Korth, that's nullified by the fact that you can just buy multiple vintage Smiths. Or simply have them tuned up. And you'll still spend a lot less.
I am very fond of my S&W Registered Magnums and Colt Pythons. But for social work or sport shooting I will pick up an MR73 or a Korth every time. They are that much better.I have some S&W's, but I really like my 2 Pythons.
You cannot "tune up" a stretched frame.
Can Ruger support the same claim in the frame size splitting the difference between the S&W K and L frames?
I would under no circumstances pay full price or close to it for one of these
Only until you start printing shotgun patterns owing to forcing cone erosion, while your shooting companions get lead showers from the barrel to cylinder gap grossly enlarged by frame stretch. Ask me how I know all that.But you can just not worry about the thousands of an inch at issue.
As I said above, aftermarket prices in Germany are quite reasonable. Besides, there are many good reasons to pay for quality once.Or you can sell it off and pull out one of the other revolvers you bought for the price of a Korth.
It's not hard to be tougher when you are slightly bigger. But size matters a lot when you carry the gun concealed. Incidentally, the later production runs of Korth revolvers include the very competitively priced, matte finished "Profi" model.The Sixes are slightly bigger than the K's. And tougher. But I'm not sure what's so valuable about being right between two S&W frame sizes.
I pay between 350 and 900 Euros for high grade Pythons in Germany. Vintage Mannlicher-Schoenauer rifles are expensive everywhere.I'm not knocking Korth. I've never shot one and given their rarity here and the incredible prices it's unlikely I ever will. Even if I had that kind of money, I'd have to work down a long list before I got to Korth. Just thinking about all the other things I could get for a few grand generates a very long list. From vintage Mannlicher-Schoenauer rifles to a brace of high grade Pythons.
In the long run, quality matters more.It's all about the price in the end.
That's a matter of opinion. If by "do not do anything that cheaper guns don't" you mean that they all go bang, then I would agree. Beyond that, and I hope all our expectations are at least a little higher, there can be a significant difference. Again, it has nothing to do with ego or status. An 870 or a Merkel 280 will both go "bang" when the trigger is pressed. The difference is that the Merkel does something the 870 does not. It is lighter. It is quicker for the first two shots. It fits me better. It handles better. It handles quicker. It points better. It has a better trigger. It has a more comfortable stock and pistol grip design. It has beautiful wood. It stirs my soul and is more enjoyable to own, shoot and hunt with.the main point, that premium guns (or in this case ultra-premium) do not do anything that cheaper guns don't
I have two Registered Magnums in excellent mechanical shape. Most of the other specimens of prewar S&W Magnum revolvers that I have examined have had their barrel to cylinder gap stretched way out of factory spec. I never came across this kind of wear in a Korth Magnum revolver. Their production numbers are comparable.For the price of a Korth you could get a S&W Registered Magnum, which will probably be equally hard to find.