Just over four years ago, I found myself marching out of my pusher's with a pair of new S&W .44 Specials - a 296 and a 696. Both were 'on clearance', the former at less than half it's $789 MSRP at $349. The 696 was still at their sticker $439, but I couldn't wait any longer to see if it would go down - I had to have it! He gave me another $10 off for buying both. Still, the sum was less than a 'decent' price today for a used 696.
The 696 is a finer version of the 3" Bulldog. It weighs in at 35.5 oz, so it is a good bit more stout, although it will use the same HKS (#CA44) speedloaders as the Bulldog. I replaced it's rounded UM's combat grips with the squared version for a while - then some nice square-conversion finger groove Ahrends in cocobolo, which it still enjoys. It's only commercial ammo thus far has been the CCI Blazer 200gr GDHP's, or GA Arms equivalents in new Starline brass. They make 840 fps from the 3" tube, well over the 800 fps Speer reccomends for reliable opening. I would assume the Bulldog to produce the same mv. The 696's diet is mainly lead - from 215-240gr LSWC/LRNFP's in both .44 Russian and Special brass. A mild 692 fps for a 240gr LSWC in a 'cute' .44 Russian case is an all-day plinker - and easily makes 'major power factor', ie, over pf of 165, for the IPSC crowd. Clean the carbon/lead crude with a proper chamber brush before loading Specials again.
Don't sell the farm to get a 696. I have seen them used going for more than the current full MSRP of a standard new 4" 629. Believe me, the 4" 629 is a far better '.44 Special' than the 696! The 696 has a definite Achille's heel... the barrel. Many were overtightened during construction, resulting in a hint of a bulge line visible in the bore. All have small forcing cones, keeping them in the 'normal' .44 Special realm, ie, no Keith or CorBon loads. It is too heavy to be a CCW, too small for a great range gun, and it's value is too great for a house/truck gun. The standard 4" 629 is easily found at a better price, has a larger hammer, trigger, sight radius, capacity (6 vs 5), and power ability (It is a .44 Magnum...), all at only 6 oz more weight than the 696. Want better recoil control than the stock grips? Try the Hogue .500 Magnum grips - both my 4" & 6" 629's, which replaced my 24's, sport them.
The 296 is a great DAO CCW - with it's smaller OEM boot grips. The Blazers are a bit noticeable with them - downright stout - but then, the loaded 296 weighs 21-22 oz - about what the empty Bulldog weighs. I can hit a 12-16" steel plate 2-3 times per cylinderfull with those Blazers - at 100yd. Some judicious clean/lube/dry-fire/repeat really eased it's DAO trigger. The Blazers do a great job on a 2L pop bottle full of water; small entry, huge split exit, and water geysering through the popped top. I no longer fear attacks from marauding 2L pop bottles full of water...
So, if you want a range .44 Special, get a 629. Want a CCW? Try the Bulldog - with those 200gr Blazer GDHP's. Want a better CCW? Get a 642/442 - .38's are quite effective - and more easily found.
Stainz