• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

45 undersized die

I’m thinking the goal of understanding the benefits of the undersized die is two fold, Bullet Retention & Setback Resistantance, both improved.
Let me know if that’s not the intention.
Okay

Looks like .4635-.464 for the U and
.4655 for two different standard dies

With no warranty expressed nor implied.

I was surprised how difficult that was
 
Thanks for taking the time to measure the dies. 👍
What expander did you use with the last loads that you tested?

When I get a good copy of the “U” die I’ll do some testing and we can go from there.
 
Just adding results to close this out.

I used the U die and factory rcbs expander.

I noticed slightly different sizing pressure, but really no felt changes to the expanding or seating operations.

Prior non U test yielded up to .010” set back on a dummy round.

With U die and 200 gr Xtreme FP I had about .001” setback per cycling. .004” total after 5 chamberings.

I will continue and see no reason not to implement this in my process.
 
Just adding results to close this out.

I used the U die and factory rcbs expander.

I noticed slightly different sizing pressure, but really no felt changes to the expanding or seating operations.

Prior non U test yielded up to .010” set back on a dummy round.

With U die and 200 gr Xtreme FP I had about .001” setback per cycling. .004” total after 5 chamberings.

I will continue and see no reason not to implement this in my process.
Happy you’re happy:)

A couple of us are still churning away on this in our own little world—post #75 describing what we’re doing.

At present I’m undersizing and not expanding except for coated bullets when I standard and expand.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top