"60 Minutes" tonight (Glock might not be our friend)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not being sarcastic ! I'm seriously suggesting that we might want to track manufacturers for their involvement with this scheme. Anybody about to buy a new firearm could, if they want, check out how their manufacturer is behaving on this issue.

(Nobody was responding to my last post, I thought maybe nobody knew how to take my suggestion :) . I killed the thread ! :) More likely, of course, nobody cares about my idea ! :) )
 
I'm a Grock basher... I can't stand them, 2x4 in the hand. But, they go bang when you pull the trigger, and Sara Brady hates it and so despite my personal perferences, I have no problems with other people buying a grock..

That said;

This situation is like your wife coming home, and finding you in bed with another woman (Sara Brady/60 Minutes) and you can say all you want to, "It's not what it looks like honey, I can explain". And when your wife storms out and you are served with divorce papers the next day, you complain about how you weren't given a chance to explain.

The situation is bad, no explaination needed. Anything that is said later on is simply damage control, that's it.

I have a friend who specializes in "data-mining" which is basically what this is. Yes, what he said is true; but if I then add a manditory gun purchase registration, then I can link ballistics to a serial number, and a serial number to you, and so that means I can link ballistics to you.. Because gun-fingerprinting is so inaccurate, I might be charged with a crime that I was nowhere near! That thought alone brings out the 1984/Brave New World fears in me..

For those who read SQL:

SELECT name, address, phone FROM registrants WHERE ballistics.glock = glock.4473
AND registrants.4473 = name.registrants

A simple database call, and I have linked a ballistics to a person's name.

It's for confiscation folks, plain and simple. If you can't read the writing on the wall, then learn to read SQL.
 
Gaston Glock bragged about his cooperation with BATF in implementing a BF program in the 2000 Glock Annual. I'm glad I don't wait for "Sixty Minutes" for BREAKING news!:banghead:
 
The combination of Glock dragging their feet on civilian gun issues affected by the recall, and now this, is definately enough for me to take a sideways look. Especially after I read the back-pedalling statement from the Glock VP after this 60 Minutes thing blew up. Sheesh. You are either for the Second Amendment or you are against it. Period.

Ruger. Smith and Wesson. Now Glock. Who's next?
 
What is the best email to use to email Glock about this issue?

Someone should make one of those online petitions. Write it up nicely reminding Glock of what happened to S&W not so long ago.
 
Inspector has it right.
If you guys believe what you are saying, Glock, Ruger and S&W should all be destroyed.
Soon you will find reasons to go after Sig and HK.

Reminds me of the elite shotgunners: no need for handguns.:banghead:
 
Find reasons?

We are being given reasons. It is amusing to see these guys who are called the "braintrust" of their respective companies earn the distrust of their most important resource--their customers. Bravo! How stupid do you have to be to not take a lesson from S&W's tribulations?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top