Sgt Thwarp
Member
Ok, before we start I know I’m opening up a red can of worms. I just hope there’s not a lot of worms in it.
I know how to reload and work up new loads. However I’ve not been much into experimenting with a lot of different powders. For my 9mm handguns I’ve been using Titegroup (that’s gonna change!!) But that’s not what I’m here for today.
I recently purchased a new M&P FPC 9mm. Boy is it a fun gun and accurate.
I truely don’t want to be run’n to buy factory ammunition all the time, finding something my rifle likes and it usually out of stock. I prefer to reload.
The problem for me is this is a pistol turned rifle and as such requires a rifle reloading mentality. I’ve watched a few videos of what some guys are doing with their PCC reloads with impressive results, 150-200fps gains and accurately. Well that floats my boat alright!
But….they’ve been developing their loads to work in older weapons.
Such as one gentleman who worked up several hard hitting loads for a British Sterling Submachine Gun (SMG) that was converted into a semiautomatic using Accurate #7 and Alliant Power pistol.
Having no experience with either powder, only in readings…..#7 is a slow(er) burning powder used for weightier projectiles or longer barrels and Power Pistol is fast(er) burning. Of course you’re not going to find load data for 16” PCC’s from the big powder makers at least as far as I can see. There’s a big reason for that. Morons and Liability insurance.
Yeah the SMG is an entirely different beast. The barrel may be thicker than today’s, but the metallurgy was different when it was developed in the late 40’s too. I prefer not to complicate things by using the SMG as a comparison. The point being…one of the two powders seem workable for my needs which is maximum velocity for either 115 or 124gr bullets. I do have both, just a lot of 115gr. I’m most concerned about pre-ejection of cases and blowouts naturally.
I’m not at all convinced that a fast burner would be the way to go. However the guy with the SMG wasn’t destroying cases either. For the most part he was using max loads FOR HANDGUNS; and that’s frightening in a modern semiauto pistol caliber carbine……or shouldn’t it be?
I’m not exactly sure which powder direction to go…fast, slow, intermediate……definitely want cleaner burning and cooler barrels. Titegroup does neither and it won’t get used in the firearm which is already a bugger to clean as it is.
The can of worms is open!
I know how to reload and work up new loads. However I’ve not been much into experimenting with a lot of different powders. For my 9mm handguns I’ve been using Titegroup (that’s gonna change!!) But that’s not what I’m here for today.
I recently purchased a new M&P FPC 9mm. Boy is it a fun gun and accurate.
I truely don’t want to be run’n to buy factory ammunition all the time, finding something my rifle likes and it usually out of stock. I prefer to reload.
The problem for me is this is a pistol turned rifle and as such requires a rifle reloading mentality. I’ve watched a few videos of what some guys are doing with their PCC reloads with impressive results, 150-200fps gains and accurately. Well that floats my boat alright!
But….they’ve been developing their loads to work in older weapons.
Such as one gentleman who worked up several hard hitting loads for a British Sterling Submachine Gun (SMG) that was converted into a semiautomatic using Accurate #7 and Alliant Power pistol.
Having no experience with either powder, only in readings…..#7 is a slow(er) burning powder used for weightier projectiles or longer barrels and Power Pistol is fast(er) burning. Of course you’re not going to find load data for 16” PCC’s from the big powder makers at least as far as I can see. There’s a big reason for that. Morons and Liability insurance.
Yeah the SMG is an entirely different beast. The barrel may be thicker than today’s, but the metallurgy was different when it was developed in the late 40’s too. I prefer not to complicate things by using the SMG as a comparison. The point being…one of the two powders seem workable for my needs which is maximum velocity for either 115 or 124gr bullets. I do have both, just a lot of 115gr. I’m most concerned about pre-ejection of cases and blowouts naturally.
I’m not at all convinced that a fast burner would be the way to go. However the guy with the SMG wasn’t destroying cases either. For the most part he was using max loads FOR HANDGUNS; and that’s frightening in a modern semiauto pistol caliber carbine……or shouldn’t it be?
I’m not exactly sure which powder direction to go…fast, slow, intermediate……definitely want cleaner burning and cooler barrels. Titegroup does neither and it won’t get used in the firearm which is already a bugger to clean as it is.
The can of worms is open!