No offense, but I just don't see the point.
I'd rather get a Sub2000 for the same price and still have a functional Glock.
Actually, for some, the point is rather
silly (imho)
.
Imagine a situation where an LEO wants more than a Glock, BUT the LEO is not part of "patrol" so the government grant for "patrol rifles" prohibits our subject from being issued an agency AR-15. Otherwise the Feds would be all upset since the Federal Grant money was to buy rifles for "patrol officers".
Then imagine the same agency gave permission for our subject to buy his own AR, BUT as luck would have it, more than half of the AR-15 configurations "approved for personal purchase and use" by the agency are not legal for the LEO to buy over-the-counter in the state.
There is no LEO exemption either. The remaining AR configurations start with a price tags of more than $1200.00. One is more like $2000.00. That's before sights or optics, and magazines. That's way more than the LEO can afford.
The subject CAN however, carry both his issued and personal-off-duty Glock while at work, and he already owns both. So, because he wants something to reach out at least 75-100 yards, he gets the Micro-Roni with the arm brace. That way..., he's using a pistol which he
legally qualified with at the range...even if it wasn't inside the Micro-Roni when he qualified.
He is complying with agency rules.
"Why not get the Endo Tactical Adapter, as it's cheaper and even with some brand of Red Dot also added to the Glock, it would still be cheaper ." Excellent idea, BUT the micro-roni has a plastic piece that covers the trigger of the Glock once in place, acting as a quasi-safety, while the Endo does not. Further the Glock in the Micro-Roni can be carried by a sling, , and agency requirements prohibit the LEO from carrying the pistol (when not actually in the LEO's hand) without the trigger on the Glock covered.
So that's why somebody might be interested in the micro-roni. I told y'all the situation was rather silly!
LD