P95Carry
Moderator Emeritus
This has probably been covered before in various threads, even obliquely - but I am thinking that the .380 is hardly (surely?) .... a round where over penetration is that much of a concern .. compared with 9mm Luger anyways. Plus - has this round either got anything like enough power to exploit the ''usual'' benefits we want from an HP? I don't think so. Adequate placement of, if necessary .. 6 or more rounds, is gonna be at least ''useful'' even if FMJ?
I only bring this up because I was vacillating over what to load my Bersa with ... knowing that it shoots better (for some reason, as yet not really explained) ..... with FMJ's. JHP's seem to always go high left somewhat, tho it does feed them OK, so that ain't an issue ... but does strike me that here the FMJ would be the better choice - you may disagree heartily .... but that's what I wanna hear, and why!!
Many regard .380 as something of a mouse cal .. to me it is in a sorta ''halfway house'' .... it is way better than .32 but obviously well under the 9mm Luger, and also below the 9 x18 Makarov.
So ..... the issue is ... FMJ vs JHP in this cal ...... pro's and cons??
I only bring this up because I was vacillating over what to load my Bersa with ... knowing that it shoots better (for some reason, as yet not really explained) ..... with FMJ's. JHP's seem to always go high left somewhat, tho it does feed them OK, so that ain't an issue ... but does strike me that here the FMJ would be the better choice - you may disagree heartily .... but that's what I wanna hear, and why!!
Many regard .380 as something of a mouse cal .. to me it is in a sorta ''halfway house'' .... it is way better than .32 but obviously well under the 9mm Luger, and also below the 9 x18 Makarov.
So ..... the issue is ... FMJ vs JHP in this cal ...... pro's and cons??