A Pair of Very Different Colt's 1903s

Status
Not open for further replies.

il_10

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
440
Location
Virginia
I thought I'd share a pair of very different Colt's 1903 Pocket Hammerless pistols with you guys. One is the beginning of an exercise in bringing the 1903 into at least the latter half of the 20th century, the other is a classic and not for tinkering.

20180118_124346.jpg
20180118_124402.jpg


Both pistols were made within a year of each other. The 'Tactical' version was made in 1911, the engraved item in 1910, making these some of the earliest Type III models with integrated bushings. The engraved one actually sneaks inside the serial number range posted on the Wiki for these.

The tactical version came to me totally stripped of any finish. I found the slide on an auction site, cut for novaks and decided to go from there; the previous owner hadn't removed enough material for the hammer to clear, so likely sold because he couldn't get his project working. I silver soldered the extended safety on today, made from a piece of 1095 steel I had for knife making, filed tongue-in-groove with the existing safety for extra strength. It'll be refinished completely as soon as i decide what I want to do.

20180118_124154.jpg

20180118_124200.jpg


The engraved model came to me as it is in a screaming flea market deal, but with factory black rubber grips. There was minor rust and pitting under the grips. I cleaned it up as best as I could, and dropped these bonded ivory grips on. I'd be interested to know when it was engraved; I suspect it's not factory due to the rollmarks and the finish quality. If anyone has insight into that, I'd be very appreciative, I may have it lettered at some point as well. It's very hard to photograph due to the high polish on it, and my camera doesn't do it justice.

20180118_124126.jpg

20180118_124211.jpg

The engraving is fairly extensive, nice touches on the grip, trigger guard, dust shied, back of the slide and frame, etc.

20180118_125049.jpg


As pretty as the engraved one is, the updated item makes a much better shooter. I've swapped the hammer and firing pin to the modern design based on Old Fuff's advise on THR many moons ago, and carry it fairly often.


20180118_124525.jpg


I'll keep you all updated on the modernized version as I continue with that project
 
The engraved model is gorgeous, whether it was factory done or not. Your modernized version looks odd, I think mostly because the grips seem incongruous with the updated sights. VZ type grips and a matte silver finish would look good, I think.
 
I’m really liking that Novak setup. The slightly different tones of bluing are giving it a neat look. I think simple checkered walnut would look great on it, especially if treated with boiled linseed oil
 
I agree on the grips, I had the ivories on it before I got the engraved one, and put the originals back on then. The two tone isn't intentional, the slide came with this thin painted finish, and the lower is an early attempt at hot tank bluing from years ago. I can do a better bluing job now, but it might be better served with one of the various ceramic sprays over a good park job.

The Novaks really make it a sweet shooter. These are probably my favorite handguns of all time, they balance, carry, and shoot excellently. I know .32 doesn't carry much cloud nowadays, but in my neck of the woods I don't often feel undergunned with a 1903.
 
The engraved model is gorgeous.

The tactical model needs forward slide serrations. Grips are also an issue. It looks like there's no kind of wraparound grip or anything for it. Hmm.
 
il_10

I like them both! Maybe a slight edge to the engraved model (love those bonded ivory grips), but I totally support any decent upgrade on the sights of the Colt Model 1903.

Have to add that I really love the look of ivory grips on a blued gun!
 
Last edited:
I don't usually like engraving, but that doesn't look half bad. Seeing them side by side, I can't help but think, they had things figured out pretty well back then.
 
Whatever the improvement in functionality, those sights wreak havoc on the character of that 1903. Like strapping fog lights to a thoroughbred.
 
Criticisms duly noted! I thought a refinish and new grips might help a bit. I bead blasted, parked, and cerakoted in HK semigloss black, and added a set of checkered walnut grips with silver medallions. I agree with Kozak6 that it could use front slide serrations, but I'm not set up to mill at the moment, and this is a utilitarian knockaround piece, so I don't want to farm it out. Maybe one of these days.

1903.jpg GetFileAttachment.jpg
 
I think it's great that you made a classic a more capable carry gun; those guns were certainly designed and made for carry originally.

Larry
 
I too love the 03, not a fan of the Novaks tho, the 03 can def. use better sights, I don't think those big honkin Novaks are the answer tho.
To me the 03 is mostly a belly gun tho they are capable of astounding accuracy. Real sweet shooter.
 
I too love the 03, not a fan of the Novaks tho, the 03 can def. use better sights, I don't think those big honkin Novaks are the answer tho.
To me the 03 is mostly a belly gun tho they are capable of astounding accuracy. Real sweet shooter.

I agree here about those huge sights - they're just too large for the pistol.

1903 then and now is a great carry gun in either caliber. They're thin, reasonably lightweight for an all steel pistol, and they point beautifully. I prefer shooting the .32 - it's an accurate cartridge that can be lethal if well placed and the pistol is a smooth operating easy shooting JB masterpiece. All my own opinion of course.

The Colt 1903 in .32acp is my second favorite pocket pistol next to my Walther PPK/s in the same caliber.

The engraved pistol must have been nice but whoever reblued the slide buffed it almost round and nearly took it all the way through the engraving. Amazing (appalling?) that any gunsmith would do such a job although I know that in the 1950's and thereabout there were a lot of "blue jobs" done where the details of the subject were not thought to be very important. Ruined a lot of fine firearms.
 
I like 'em both. I carried a 1908 for a couple months. One of the best carrying autos ever, IMO.

You typo'd right?

1908 is the Colt .25 cal "Vest Pocket Pistol" that shares a lot of the 1903 features but is a much smaller pistol. Never tried it but I think the little guy could be carried in the small pocket in a pair of Levi's jeans.
 
Criticisms duly noted! I thought a refinish and new grips might help a bit. I bead blasted, parked, and cerakoted in HK semigloss black, and added a set of checkered walnut grips with silver medallions. I agree with Kozak6 that it could use front slide serrations, but I'm not set up to mill at the moment, and this is a utilitarian knockaround piece, so I don't want to farm it out. Maybe one of these days.

View attachment 776257 View attachment 776258

That's a great improvement on the "tactical" version. :cool:
 
You typo'd right?

1908 is the Colt .25 cal "Vest Pocket Pistol" that shares a lot of the 1903 features but is a much smaller pistol. Never tried it but I think the little guy could be carried in the small pocket in a pair of Levi's jeans.

The 1908 Pocket Hammerless is the .380 version of the 1903 Pocket Hammerless.
 
You typo'd right?

1908 is the Colt .25 cal "Vest Pocket Pistol" that shares a lot of the 1903 features but is a much smaller pistol. Never tried it but I think the little guy could be carried in the small pocket in a pair of Levi's jeans.
No, The common name of the the .380 version of the Pocket hammerless is the M1908, to include US Army nomenclature. The M1908 Colt was issued to General officers. The common name of the .25 Colt Auto pistol is the Colt Vest Pocket Pistol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top