A tale of a load gone wrong

Status
Not open for further replies.

snuffy

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
2,930
Location
Oshkosh Wi
This may be a bit deep for new reloaders, but it should be read by everybody.

Here's the scenario; I was loading for a new-to-me 300 win mag. In fact I had never loaded for a win mag before. I was supplied with the rifle, brass fired in that rifle and new dimension Hornady dies. Also a lee trimmer pilot.

Looking at my powder selections, I saw a ¼ pound bottle of H-4831 SC, which is what I wanted to use. I also looked at the Hodgdon website for some ideas for what other powder types were on the data chart. I saw H-hybrid-100-V. Also IMR-4007-SSC. A visit to my local gunshop that has the best selection of powders in the area showed me no H-4831-SC, but the 100-V AND the IMR-4007-SSC. I bought a pound of each.

The bullet for this load would be the new Hornady GMX, 165 grain.

I settled on the 100-V, loaded 4-5 shot groups of one powder charge, starting mid-range in the data. Meaning I didn't start at recommended starting load,(66.0). GMX bullets are expensive, so I didn't want to waste any. 69.0, 70.0, 71.0, 72.0 were the loads. First the targets, then the chronograph data.

scan0001_1.jpg


scan0002.jpg


scan0003_1.jpg


scan0005.jpg


What would JUST the targets tell you? Not so good as far as groups, but the 70.0 group showed vertical stringing, a sign the powder burn rate is very wrong for the cartridge. Now the chronograph readings really tell "THE REST OF THE STORY"!

69.0 2 shots recorded, was off to the side and too close to the screens.
av 3099
hi 3100
lo 2999
es 1.3
sd .9

70.0 5 shots
a 3240
h 3269
l 3216
es 52.9
sd 19.8

71.0 5 shts
a 3230
h 3263
l 3198
es 64.1
sd 32.8

72.0 2 shots
a 3189
h 3194
l 3180
es 14.2
sd 10.1

The sole purpose of all this is to point out the usefulness of a chrono when developing loads. The reverse readings are indicative of reaching, and in this case exceeding the pressure ceiling of a powder-bullet-primer-rifle combo. Primers used were rem. 9½-M. Bullets were seated to the top of the front band, 3.340 OAL.

Another indication of excess pressure is primer pocket expansion, to the point where the fired shell will NOT hold a primer. Both the 71 and 72 grain brass cases would NOT hold a primer, and primed with almost no effort.

A third indication of pressure is CHE and PRE, Case Head Expansion and Pressure Ring Expansion. I miked the area just ahead of the belt with my mic capable of .0001 accuracy. The 69 and 70 grain loads were the same as the once fired factory brass I was given,(winchester). The 71.0 was .0003 MORE than the factory, and the 72.0 was .0005 more. That's a pressure ring measurement.

It's apparent that the Hodgdon hybrid 100 V is too fast for this particular load. It MAY be the extra tough bullet engraves harder, raising pressure. Could be almost anything, but how would I know without the chrono?

You SHOULD get a steady incremental climb in velocity with each even increase in powder charge. When the increase slows down, or as in this case reverses, you're into the danger area. Bolt lift was normal, which surprised me. The rifle is a Herters U-9, which is a FN mauser action.

Another load work-up using AA,(accurate arms) 4350 yielded what I was after, Max velocity,(3289 fps), with a 1" 3 shot group @ 100 yds.
 
Nice explanation, snuffy.

Thanks for sharing a lesson learned.

Not surprised that A4350 was a good powder. Maybe try R22 next time. 300 Wby Mag loves it, maybe Win Mag likes it too.
 
Snuf
Very interesting, thanks for the data. If you decide to try something other than the 4350, mat I recomment RL22 or H1000. Excellent powders for this case. Good luck!
~z

I see I am in good company with the RL22 comment
 
Last edited:
You are using a target that contributes to aiming errors. Go back to square one and begin again. It's amazing how many shooters use targets that cause problems to begin with and they don't realize.
 
You are using a target that contributes to aiming errors. Go back to square one and begin again. It's amazing how many shooters use targets that cause problems to begin with and they don't realize.

Izat so! Just what do you recommend? What does the target have to do with the point of my thread? The powder just was not right for the load, the target has/had nothing to do with that. Is this target any better?

scan0001.jpg


Then when I got the rifle figured out;

scan0003.jpg



Ants and ~z, thanks for the positive comments. I have some R-19, I almost tried that instead of the AA-4350. Didn't think of R-22 while at the gunshop.

Oh well, the H-100-V looks like a good powder for my 300 WSM, so does the IMR-4007-SSC. BTW, Hodgdon says the hybrid name was used because the powder is made using the formula for making ball powder, then is extruded and cut is a SSC length. It's fine grained, meters well.
 
ants said:
Maybe try R22 next time. 300 Wby Mag loves it, maybe Win Mag likes it too.

~z said:
I recommend RL22 or H1000. Excellent powders for this case.

My .300 Win Mag likes Reloder 22 as well. Here are two five-shot groups shot at 100 yards on the same day using 71.6gr of Reloder 22, W-W Super cases, CCI 250 primers and a 208gr A-MAX bullet (average velocity = 2,855 fps). I messed up one shot in the second group shown on the left but you get the idea. I adjusted the scope for the second group too.

71.6gr_reloder22_208gr_amax.jpg



snuffy said:
the 70.0 group showed vertical stringing, a sign the powder burn rate is very wrong for the cartridge.

How do you know that the vertical stringing isn't due to barrel/rifle harmonics? I use the OCW method for all my load development and frequently see groups transition from horizontal stringing to circular to vertical stringing to circular and back to horizontal stringing as the powder is increased.

:)
 
If it was me shooting a 300 Win Mag, the vertical stringing would be due to flinching! :neener:

There probably would be some side to side movement too.

Cases with expanded primer pockets sure give one a clue that pressures are high!

Good write up Snuffy! :D:D
 
Nice writeup, snuffy. I don't load for 300WM, but I imagine I will eventually... so I appreciate you scouting in advance. :)
 
How do you know that the vertical stringing isn't due to barrel/rifle harmonics?

My past experience with other rifles/single shot pistols has shown me that wrong powder burn rates can do that. But, you're probably right, it was barrel harmonics that did that one. Otherwise, they all would have looked like that.

If it was me shooting a 300 Win Mag, the vertical stringing would be due to flinching! :neener:

Ha ha! Actually this one is tamed. With a decelerator pad, AND an internal mercury recoil absorber, it shoots without undue recoil.

That's some good shooting 1858!:D
 
Snuffy,
I also recommend the RL-22 powder. It works great with my three 300 WBY, my 300 RUM, and my 338 RUM.

Quarter size groups @ 100 yards if I eat my Wheaties.

Good stuff.

LGB
 
Shooting both on the same platform, I thought 7mmRemMag kicked worse than 300WinMag.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top