AK 47 Rear Sights

Status
Not open for further replies.

Seven High

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
755
Does anyone have experience with after market rear sights for the AK? I am looking at one from Krebs custom. Any comments would be appreciated.
 
I keep thinking about one but I just dont see any real benefit over more plain old training.
 
The problem with the AK rear site isn't the design, its the too-short site radius. If you want a more accurate AK, I'd just get a side rail and an inexpensive 2x7 scope.
 
I had one.

I had a Bulgarian AK that I put a Krebs rear peep sight on and it did improve accuracy, made target aquisition easier, was easier for me to use than the stock rear sight on the AK. I also found that using one of the Tapco bright front sights made a difference too ( I used orange).

But, these days there are better choices than Krebs rear peep.
For better accuracy, you need to lengthen the sight radius on the AK and I'd recommend the Dogleg sight from Texas Weapon Systems with their rear peep sight. Find info here: http://texasweaponsystems.com/id1.html
 
But, these days there are better choices than Krebs rear peep.
For better accuracy, you need to lengthen the sight radius on the AK and I'd recommend the Dogleg sight from Texas Weapon Systems with their rear peep sight. Find info here: http://texasweaponsystems.com/id1.html

I have a dog leg and mounted a red dot on the rail. It is very secure for windage but the jury is still out as far as azimuth.
 
I keep thinking about one but I just dont see any real benefit over more plain old training. The sight radius on an AK is the same a carbine AR 15.
 
I keep thinking about one but I just dont see any real benefit over more plain old training. The sight radius on an AK is the same a carbine AR 15.

My AK is a great shooting little rifle but my eye sight has gotten so bad that plain old irons are pretty much out for me unless I want to wear some type of progressive or bi-focal glasses. Same with the SKSs so it is optics or red dots for me. Getting old sucks more than I thought once upon a time.....
 
Why don't we ever see threads claiming the M4 sight radius is too short given its the same as that of an ak?
 
Why don't we ever see threads claiming the M4 sight radius is too short given its the same as that of an ak?

My theory is that the rear sight aligns to your eye automatically, and moving the gun doesn't move it appreciably.

The AK's rear sight is forward of the centerline in regards of your grip. So it moves, visually, when the rifle does. Thus, you have to focus on aligning both sights, whereas the AR's rear remains in place from your point of view and therefor you only have to concentrate on the front.

Plus, peep sights just seem nicer to the guys that like their AR's. I like them, too, and also agree that the dogleg is the cure for 90% of my gripes about the AK.
 
I have the older Krebs peep that is adjustable for windage as well.
For the life of me, I don't know why they stopped making them.
But a peep is an improvement for certain.
 
My theory is that the rear sight aligns to your eye automatically, and moving the gun doesn't move it appreciably.
That's a fair explanation of why aperture sights are easier and more precise than notch-and-post (Patridge, or v-notch, "buckhorn," etc) type iron sights.

And also begins to explain part of why the "aperture-style" rear sights that replace the AK or SKS rear sight with a peep hole, but still keep it located so far forward aren't really gaining you anything.
 
Iron sights, what's that. Oh that metal thingy hiding behind my quad rail with a scout style mounted pistol scope on it. Ya I give up on those and went with glass.
 
That's a fair explanation of why aperture sights are easier and more precise than notch-and-post (Patridge, or v-notch, "buckhorn," etc) type iron sights.

And also begins to explain part of why the "aperture-style" rear sights that replace the AK or SKS rear sight with a peep hole, but still keep it located so far forward aren't really gaining you anything.

Well, that's only "kinda" true.
You do benefit quite a bit from a rear peep on an AK.
I noticed the difference immediately and my accuracy improved and groups tightened up too.

Even though the rear sight is forward, it's still closer to your face than the rear sight of a pistol or revolver while shooting.
 
You certainly may see an improvement just due to the different size of the rear opening, reduction in glare into/on the rear sight, etc.

My point is that it in no way is "ghosting" out like a true aperture sight does, allowing you to see only the front sight, and consciously only "aligning" the front sight with the target.

With any iron sight located so far forward you're still consciously aligning the target, front sight, and rear sight, which is not the principle on which true aperture sights operate.
 
You certainly may see an improvement just due to the different size of the rear opening, reduction in glare into/on the rear sight, etc.

My point is that it in no way is "ghosting" out like a true aperture sight does, allowing you to see only the front sight, and consciously only "aligning" the front sight with the target.

With any iron sight located so far forward you're still consciously aligning the target, front sight, and rear sight, which is not the principle on which true aperture sights operate.


Ah....I see what you mean now.
Yes, that's true.
It will not ghost out totally like an M16 rear.
True.
 
I have the Tech Sights rear sight for my AK, and it greatly improved my shooting with the rifle. It nearly doubles the sight radius... it actually has a little longer sight radius than a rifle length AR now. Also, the benefits of an aperture over a notch have already been stated.

JustinJ, it is strange that you haven't heard it before, but I will go ahead and say it: AR carbine-length sight radius is too short! It is still a bit longer than an AK's, and it is a little better in that it is an aperture instead of a notch, but most shooters will greatly benefit from a longer sight radius. I wish Stoner hadn't cheaped out and put the front sight on the gas block, instead of putting it out on the end of the barrel where it belongs! Mikhail had that part right, but screwed the pooch on the rear sight. John Garand on the other hand had it all figured out! ;)

The TWS rear sight looks nice too, but if you don't want the whole top rail, Tech Sights are a good choice. Also, Tech Sights are adjustable for both windage and elevation at the rear sight, so you have nice 1 MOA clicks in both directions, instead of having to adjust the factory front post for elevation, like you would on a TWS or Krebs.
 
I have the Tech Sights rear sight for my AK, and it greatly improved my shooting with the rifle. It nearly doubles the sight radius... it actually has a little longer sight radius than a rifle length AR now. Also, the benefits of an aperture over a notch have already been stated.

JustinJ, it is strange that you haven't heard it before, but I will go ahead and say it: AR carbine-length sight radius is too short! It is still a bit longer than an AK's, and it is a little better in that it is an aperture instead of a notch, but most shooters will greatly benefit from a longer sight radius. I wish Stoner hadn't cheaped out and put the front sight on the gas block, instead of putting it out on the end of the barrel where it belongs! Mikhail had that part right, but screwed the pooch on the rear sight. John Garand on the other hand had it all figured out! ;)

The TWS rear sight looks nice too, but if you don't want the whole top rail, Tech Sights are a good choice. Also, Tech Sights are adjustable for both windage and elevation at the rear sight, so you have nice 1 MOA clicks in both directions, instead of having to adjust the factory front post for elevation, like you would on a TWS or Krebs.

Do Tech Sights cause the problem of no longer being able to use any side mounted optics?
 
Stoner didn't "cheap out" when he designed the location of the front sight. In those pre-M203 days, armies used rifle grenades, and the AR system was designed with a bare section of barrel so a grenade could be slipped over the muzzle.
As far as the AK sights are concerned, I like them fine.
For fast close range shooting, I just place the front sight post/ring in between the two hinges at the front of the rear sight...they look like square posts from the rear...very fast and open.
For more accurate fire, I do fine work with the standard rear sight.
This pic shows two five shot groups, separated by a sight adjustment, fired at 100 yards through heavy rain that made it hard to see the target. Fired using my Yugo M70 under folder which was built from a Serb war surplus parts kit with original Yugo barrel.
DSC01611.jpg
 
The magazine pictured is Polish...polymer with steel feed lips. About five years ago they were $10 apiece brand new. A gun show dealer had a big box of them, and I bought four.
Not sure if they are still around, but they are great mags.
 
Why don't we ever see threads claiming the M4 sight radius is too short given its the same as that of an ak

Because its an aperture, quite close to your eye which has a "lens" effect to sharpen your vision. Makes an enormous difference once you get ~40 years old, doesn't hinder 20 year old eyes either since the modest "pinhole" lens effect of the aperture increases apparent depth of field helping with sight alignment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top