Aluminum Uzi Receiver

Status
Not open for further replies.

OneWound

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
404
So I got to thinking, would it be possible to machine an Uzi receiver out of aluminum while using an old Uzi parts for everything else (except barrel, bolt etc etc etc)?

The aluminum would be 6061-T651
 
It might be possible.

But it would be against federal law using old (real) Uzi open bolt parts.

Don't go there.

rc
 
So I got to thinking, would it be possible to machine an Uzi receiver out of aluminum while using an old Uzi parts for everything else (except barrel, bolt etc etc etc)?

The aluminum would be 6061-T651
The wall thickness will have to be greater, to get the same stiffness, the front trunnion could be machined in place, maybe the mag-well too....

All-in-all, I don't think it would be any easier. Certainly not faster.
 
It might be possible.

But it would be against federal law using old (real) Uzi open bolt parts.

Don't go there.

rc
I understand. Hence why I said I won't be using old barrel, bolt, etc...IE there would be the blocking bar, a semi-auto sear, etc.

I understand it wouldn't be faster, but it sounds like a fun project while I have access to CNC machines..
 
I say give it a shot. The worse thing that could happen if your careful is that you learn how to better operate a CNC machine and the intricacies of building an UZI.
 
I'm not sure the aluminum would stand up to the stresses. Even so, 6061 would be a poor choice. 7075 would be a much better choice
 
Anything is possible, given enough time and money. I suspect you're going to run out of one or the other before you get this project complete.

Besides stiffness, check into your alloy's resistance to cracking and peening. The front trunnion is also the bolt stop and has a pound of steel slamming into it every time you fire a semi-auto Uzi.

BSW
 
I'm not sure the aluminum would stand up to the stresses. Even so, 6061 would be a poor choice. 7075 would be a much better choice
I understand that 7075 is a better material, but since I will not be paying for material (or machine time), I figure it will be worth a shot.
 
If you aren't having to pay for it, why not just machine it from steel? I'm sure it'll be slower and wear out more tools, but I wouldn't think you'd need to worry about it being strong enough at that point.
 
I work on aircraft structures. 6061 is too malleable. Unless you are just building a proof of concept and don't plan to shoot it but a couple of times, 7075 or 7175 is a much better choice
 
It is not illegal to use "Modified for semi auto " full auto parts... I would not have a receiver or bolt that was unmodified that would work together though....
 
Although I will not be paying for material, it's hard to justify to my boss that buying 7075 AI is somehow better than using 6061 (I work in a lab that does testing with CNC machines..). Although I am able to run steel, we do not have the proper tooling (all our tools are optimizated for titanium and aluminum). The more I think about, the more I don't know how applicable it is. Maybe some day!
 
Now titanium could be very cool...
I would love to do that. But I forgot to mention I am talking about 3D printed titanium, ie it will break to due stresses made when printing it. Although...I've been mulling around the idea of making a titanium compensator...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top