• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

ammo for SP101 3"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
84
I'm about to pick up a new SP101 with a 3" barrel.

This is a tool I'll keep handy in case something walks in unannounced through my always-open-doors at a house high in the Sierras. Also, the thought of a mountain lion lurking at the property corners or under the house also has my attention.

I'm thinking Federal Fusion .357 mag 158 grain SJHP. What do you think?
 
Something with a lswc 158 gr should handle just about anything. In Tn I carry 125 gr. jsp from Remington and feel good when hiking/woods bumming
ll
 
It's so hard to tell someone what ammo to choose for their revolver. Some ammo shoots better than other in different guns. If you are worried about 4 legged critters I would suggest something that will penetrate deeply like a Hard Cast bullet. If you handload you can use almost anything you like. Barnes makes a 140gr XPB Pistol Bullets that will do a GREAT job on 2 and 4 legged critters. If you don't reload Federal loads that 140gr bullet in Factory Ammo. (Part #P357XB1)

Since our revolver is small and light I'll not suggest some of the heavier bullet ammo I would normally suggest but I do like a 180gr Hard Cast bullet in a heavier revolver like the S&W M686 or Ruger GP100.
 
Before I stupidly sold my SP101 3", THIS is what I carried.

Now that's a load you can be proud of.
 
When we go out in the woods with a 3" SP101 we load it with 158 grain Speer Gold Dots.
 
Remington 125gr soft points are a handful in a small frame revolver. They take some getting used to. Federal's basic 158gr JHP is a much more managable load.
 
I keep my loaded up with Cor-bon's 125 gr DPX ammo, but I my opinion's biased towards 100% copper bullets. I think any of the ammo mentioned here would be good enough for 2-legged threats and 4-legged ones up to mountain lions.

+1 on what ArchAngleCD said about heavier bullets; if I wanted to shoot 180-200 gr gas-check hardcasts, I'd prefer a larger revolver even thought he SP101 could handle it. You don't really need bullets that heavy unless you feel threatened by blackbears anyway.
 
I use DT 158 gr JHP and DT 180 gr HC for woods carry in my 3" SP101. A SP101 handles recoil just as well, if not better, than a GP100.
 
Remington 125gr soft points are a handful in a small frame revolver. They take some getting used to. Federal's basic 158gr JHP is a much more managable load.

The sp101 handles recoil like a large frame revolver. Somehow.
 
well, I went with the 158 gn Gold Dots, Cabella's had them on sale (backordered, but on sale)

I honestly hope I never have to use one, but I like having written on the box "Personal Protection", it might help if I ever have to explain the story someday (again, hoping I do not!)
 
Speer 135 gr .357 short barrel

Works wonders out of my 2.25 SP101.....as easy to control as .38 Speer plus P
 
My Smith & Wesson 2.5" barrel model 66 is stoked with Hornady's
"Critical Defense" .357 Mag 125 grain FTX rounds; part # 90500,
with an advertised MV of 1500 fps, 1301 @ 50 yards, and 1147
@ 100 yards. Good e'nuff for any two legged critters that may
wish to try me~! ;) :D
 
I wanted to post my agreement with a this:

harmon rabb: "The sp101 handles recoil like a large frame revolver. Somehow. "

I find the same to be true in my hands. To be specific, I bought a .357 SP101 snubby in the early 1990's, and recoil hurt. I was using the notably hot 125-grain Federal JHPs, as this is what I carried in my larger GP100 and S&W sixguns, and I had not yet learned the importance of holding small snubbies with the web of my hand really HIGH on the grip frame. This high hold causes recoil to dissipate through the wrist into the arm, rather than causing upward kick that hits the web of the hand. (Of course, the design, and greater mass, of the SP101 are important parts of the equation.)

Fast forward to the late 1990's, after learning to hold high and to grip hard but too hard, and I tried another SP101. This time, everything clicked. The 125-grain to-the-firewall loads are still not pleasant, but they are merely unpleasant, not painful. Winchester 145-grain Silvertips are now a favored load, when I can find it. This is not a mere middle magnum, but is not loaded to the max pressure, either, and the 145-grain bullets hit closer to point of aim with fixed-sight revolvers than the lighter-bullet loads. FWIW, this Silvertip load found much favor with peace officers in Texas, who used the 145-grain Silvertips and the 125-grain hot Federal and Remington JHPs in real-life gunfights, to good effect.

158-grain JHP ammo is also usually fine, for both point-of-impact and relatively comfortable recoil, though I find Speer Gold Dots easier to find locally.

The Speer Short Barrel Gold Dots feel like .38 +P not through any magic, but because they are loaded to quite mild velocity and pressure, a virtual .38 Special in a .357 Magnum case. I am not saying there is anything wrong with that, of course. There is good utility for such mild magnums, not the least of which is that they don't leave a ring of fouling at the front of the chamber like a .38 will.

To be clear, most of my personal experience with the SP101 is with the 2.25" version, not the 3.06". I finally bought a 3.06" only recently.
 
Rexter, I own a GP100 and a SP101. The SP101 handles .357mag recoil better, god knows how. Perhaps it does have something to do with it rolling upwardly in my hand under recoil.

I used to have a S&W 442. Even standard pressure .38spl was painful out of that thing. I have never hated a gun so much as that one. I traded it off for a 1911, then bought my SP101. With whatever my natural grip position on the SP101 is, it's more comfortable with full house .357mag than that 442 was with .38spl.

I bought it to have a revolver carry option that offered a gain in ballistics over my autoloaders, never expecting it to be downright fun at the range. But it is. It's a blast.
 
I agree, since I got my 3" SP101 a couple weeks ago, I haven't shot anything else,since !!! I've been regularly prowling every Wally World in the area in search of more Winny white-box .38 :D.
 
With a fingergroove grip the 125's can be managed.. just saying the stock Ruger grips leave much to be desired with any 'fire breathing' load. Change grips you maye have a less concealable piece--if that's a concern for you at all.

Shooting Dad's SP 101 next to my Colt Magnum Carry, the Ruger is downright squirrelly in my grip with those Remington 125's. The Colt has more recoil but I don't feel like it's fighting my hand.

Shooting 158's out of either is about the same.

If I bought an SP, I'd swap the grips no matter what I was shooting out of it.
 
Hey Dr. Rob, at the risk of being repetitive ( since it seems nearly everyone does this ) pick up a Hogue mono-grip for your dad's SP101. It's a night & day difference from those cheesy factory grips, while (oddly) not really increasing the overall volume that much at all.
 
That's what's on my Colt.

Dad liked the factory grips, it's his gun. If I inherit it someday I'll swap them out, til then I have my Colt. I got good grips, and extra shot and a horsey logo. ;)

Dad also has a 6 inch GP 100, those 125's are impressive out of that thing as well. It's heavy enough that you don't get the 'grip slip' but it's still evident that you are shooting a powerful load.

Haven't tried them out of his 4 inch Dan Wesson with Pachmeyers, but I suspect it would fall 'between' the Colt and the GP.
 
First of all you are going to love that pistol. Next, I have had very good experience with the Sellier & Bellot 357 158 grain soft lead flat nose semi jacketed. the 3" barrel SP really likes that round.
 
158 grain Gold Dot was a good choice. :)

Bonded bullets hold together and penetrate, and hopefully expand as well.

Personally, if I ever bought anything other than 158 LSWC, it would be XTP or Gold Dot. For a 4" GP100, though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top