What makes anyone think that the anti-gun forces have not implemented plans to create massacres?
In almost every case, from Stockton to the L.I.R.R. shootings, the killer was disturbed, but also poor. He had no money until he "found" enough to travel to a "lax gun law" state, put up in motels, and buy expensive guns and ammunition. Then he took his gun, and with "a slight smile on his face" killed a lot of people. (Note there is always "a dazed expression with a slight smile", a sign of chemical brainwashing.)
If anyone were able to track the money those people suddenly had available, I wonder where it would lead.
And does anyone wonder how the Washington area "Beltway snipers" turned up so conveniently when a push was needed to get an anti-gun candidate into the Maryland governorship, and just after Michael D. Barnes, then-head of the Brady Campaign said he would "do anything, anything" to keep the Republican candidate from being elected. He was never asked just how far "anything" went.
We tend to think that our opposition, even though wrong and fanatical at times, is basically honest and willing to fight cleanly in the political arena. Most probably are, but what if some are not? What if some are so fanatical and dedicated that they will "prove the need" for a gun ban at any cost and by any means?
Jim
In almost every case, from Stockton to the L.I.R.R. shootings, the killer was disturbed, but also poor. He had no money until he "found" enough to travel to a "lax gun law" state, put up in motels, and buy expensive guns and ammunition. Then he took his gun, and with "a slight smile on his face" killed a lot of people. (Note there is always "a dazed expression with a slight smile", a sign of chemical brainwashing.)
If anyone were able to track the money those people suddenly had available, I wonder where it would lead.
And does anyone wonder how the Washington area "Beltway snipers" turned up so conveniently when a push was needed to get an anti-gun candidate into the Maryland governorship, and just after Michael D. Barnes, then-head of the Brady Campaign said he would "do anything, anything" to keep the Republican candidate from being elected. He was never asked just how far "anything" went.
We tend to think that our opposition, even though wrong and fanatical at times, is basically honest and willing to fight cleanly in the political arena. Most probably are, but what if some are not? What if some are so fanatical and dedicated that they will "prove the need" for a gun ban at any cost and by any means?
Jim