Antis believe suing gunmakers will end mass shootings

[armoredman]

they have sued and the plaintiffs won countless times.

Did they drive a single manufacturer out of business?

 

[armoredman]

I would imagine that a large section on the mass shootings tally is gang related. There fore in my book that's tough toenails. But, the drip drip drip of school age children being slaughtered en mass by young disconnected male youth is NOT going to be allowed forever. Right after Sandy Hook I remember one group standing up and they said "Sorry your dead children don't trump my 2A" That's where we are. But, Boy's in a civilized society, that drip drip drip is coming to a conclusion. The sooner the better. Instead of measuring every man's dick with a 2A ruler start with a dead school child and work forward from there, while maintaining our constitutional rights.

Another one surfaces..."I like the 2A but..." and the dead child reference. What laws were changed after the largest school massacre in US history and what effect did it have? Why don't you start with all the people who died for us to have the freedoms we have and work your way forward to FIXING the problem, like hardening the schools, punishing people who break the law, reinstating cash bail everywhere, let parents and teachers carry on school grounds, and make sure those who kill don't get out of prison until they are quite old and gray?

 

[MikeInOr]

One major thing we don't have is allies in the mainstream media to project our agenda to the entire population like the anti's and rainbow haired they/them leftists currently enjoy.

The rainbow haired them/they leftists that I know are more pro 2A than a lot of other people I know. The small minded homophobes on this board, on the other hand, often make me ashamed to be a member though!

 

[GEM]

Did they drive a single manufacturer out of business?

American Derringer folded because of a lawsuit. Some suits have settled out of court. Ruger and Glock have paid off folks - but this was for NDs blamed on the gun.

There are significant supporters of gun rights in minority, ethnic, religious and sexual orientation communities. When gun 'rights' people descend to discussing and attacking these groups, they basically convince the general public that the gun 'rights' community is not worth the time of day.

 

[Hartkopf]

Nobody was attacked. Many groups get coordinated media coverage with a heartfelt story. Gun rights groups do not get the same coverage or narrative.

They (yea I know, who are they?) are trying to divide us in multiple ways. They are successful most of the time.

 

[Fyrstyk]

I just can't get my head around how the gun manufacturer can be sued for the illegal use of its product. If this is the case, then why can't the car manufactures be sued for a drunk driver killing someone? The advertising for some car makes show speeding and other dangerous maneuvers that could encourage potential buyers of that make and model to try that could result in death. How is this different from gun advertisements?

 

[Bill Raby]

“Antis believe suing gunmakers will end mass shootings.” No, they don’t. They just want to be able to sue gunmakers out of existence.

You are wrong. They actually do believe this. Have to realize that there is no rational thought involved in the gun control fantasy.

 

[Walkalong]

If the resident mod(s) want the clean up the grossly off topic and inflammatory posts/remarks and reopen this, so be it, but until then………..

 

[Robert]

Na, it's my day off, I have cleaning up to around my house.