Yes, it would have been nice if the OP had included a picture or a good description instead of just a (possibly nonexistent) model number.
Yes it would have been nice, but this thread was started by a new member who joined THR on April 9th. and then logged his first post.
In other words he's a newcomer who doesn't necessarily understand the complications involved in identifying some lesser known guns. So he posted what information he could find, and he might (or might not) have transposed a number.
And he may or may not have access to a camera, or understand how to post pictures on this forum.
I for one, am absolutely delighted that he decided to join us, and I hope he feels welcome and stays.
As far as the gun's concerned, I'll gladly cut him some slack, and if he comes back with a revised model number instead of the one posted I'll take the time and make an effort to answer his questions.
Because when you get down to it, that's one thing THR is all about, and why we've grown to be as big as we are.