troy fairweather
Member
I've always wanted a ar-10 in 7-08 be prefect for about anything, something on the 284 case would be cool but not probably worn it since the mag length is limited. One in 458American would be cool.
I have thought about doing one, would be a bit pricy and don't know if I'd go longer then 20" in a lighter contour for hunting. New York not making it easy either.@troy fairweather
Have you looked at the 7mm Valkyrie? You get about the same performance but it's in an AR-15 package.
If I had the extra cash I would just build a upper in each of the two and one lower for them to share.I don't think the 350 offers enough over the 358 to even take the chance of dealing with feeding belted cartridges thru an AR, the 358 should run like butter in 20 round mags if you want.
The 450 is another matter that could be interesting, heck it's your headache and $$$ so my vote is 450 lol. Keep us posted
That's the right answer. I am curious if a belted mag would be able to feed in an ar10If I had the extra cash I would just build a upper in each of the two and one lower for them to share.
Nemo arms made a .300 win mag ar type rifleThat's the right answer. I am curious if a belted mag would be able to feed in an ar10
The Raptor is just so short, seems like a miss opportunity to me.I’d stick with the original plan.
45 Raptor.
That's because for the most part a 308 with the right bullet is more than adequate for deer, boar and the smaller bears. Big bears and moose are seen as a bigger step up and as much as I was a 358 fan when I was a teen I recognize that it's really not much of a step up from a 308 with modern bullets.I would have thought that there would have been a bit more available for medium and big bore AR-10 thumpers out there, but I guess it hasn't caught on in the AR-10 like it did in the AR-15.
I would have stuck with the 308
358 with heavier bullets will lose less than a 308. IMHO if I was doing this I'd actually prefer the 16".Partly due to availability of ammo and reloading components and partly due to the fact that it will sufficiently fit the bill! Now my question is to barrel length. My original plan was 20". Wilson combat is having a black Friday sale on all of their barrels, but they only offer a 16". Would I loose a lot going down to the 16" or will it not make that much difference with the .358 win?
I was just about to order the Wilson combat .358 win barrel and noticed that it has a 1:14 twist rate. I have read that to stabilize bullets in the 220+ grain range it has to be 1:12. It that is the case maybe I should go a different route then the Wilson combat358 with heavier bullets will lose less than a 308. IMHO if I was doing this I'd actually prefer the 16".
Matter of fact I'm part of the reason the 16" 308 Recon is now out of stock lol.
Are you planning on shooting subsonics? I ran the numbers in streloc on the 250 Swift A frame and the 225 TSX both were in the 2+ stabilization range with a 1:14 and 2200fps.I was just about to order the Wilson combat .358 win barrel and noticed that it has a 1:14 twist rate. I have read that to stabilize bullets in the 220+ grain range it has to be 1:12. It that is the case maybe I should go a different route then the Wilson combat
No, nothing subsonic. Just that exact load, and 225 gr hotcores. It sounds like what I read may be incorrect. It was just on another forum.Are you planning on shooting subsonics? I ran the numbers in streloc on the 250 Swift A frame and the 225 TSX both were in the 2+ stabilization range with a 1:14 and 2200fps.