Thanks to all so far. I am referring to mechanical reliability rather than accuracy.
My experience with Adaptors only extends back to 1979. I found the old Cobrays to be not as accurate in M16 A1s as when using 193 ball, but accurate enough to train the folks I was responsible for. At the time the main complaints were mechanical functioning and I found that in those days the main culprit was lack of cleaning. I am not talking about your rifle aut for an after noon of fun, but adaptors in M-16 A1s that are being used by numerous trainees one after another. I found mechanical functioning was greatly enhanced by pulling units off the line and replacing them with clean units while the originals were cleaned and then rotating those with the next batch etc etc.
Still there were and are the occasional ( or in the case of the latest adaptor I have from Oily Arms, frequent) "now what caused the thing to not fire?" Moments when it is clean, lubricated, properly installed, and using quality ammo. As I occasionally find light primer strikes on unfired rounds, I believe the unit is backing out of the chamber slightly and then the hammer is wasting part of its energy shoving the unit back into position......much as can happen with a dirty chamber in say a 10/22 or Marlin 60 stopping a round before the rim is seated on the breech face.
I have considered ordering one of the hammer springs made for use with 5.45mm uppers that has the umph to deal with former Soviet military primers, but have been concerned that this might cause punctured primers with US commercial ammo.
Thus the interest in the plug.....
-kBob