LocoGringo
Member
You get the fight you get - we don’t get to pick our encounter where we have to deploy our cc firearm.
What scenario are you seeing, outside that range, that would still be considered "self defense"? Serious question, because I'm drawing a blank...
Elisjsha Dicken came to mind as soon as I saw the thread title. What advantage does NOT having sights give? It seems stupid to me to not have sights on a gun. Yes, an accomplished shooter can shoot well without sights, but how much practice did it take him/her to get to that stage? Does the average concealed carrier do that much practice or training? As I understand it, most concealed carriers go through the class and call it "good" never really practicing again. So now they shouldn't have sights?Tell that to Elisjsha Dicken.
Yes, I believe ALL firearms should have some form of sights. If one trains enough to not need them, great, but it seems stupid to NOT have sights on a firearm.