JASmith
Member
Look at this review and consider the possibilities:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddQvhdCyhe4
Our President apparently intends to sign this treaty in December to help combat global warming. Problem is, the treaty goes well beyond simple carbon exchanges. It discusses a move toward a "gobal government" with, I understand, no voting our public comment being considered.
Does anyone see the loss of sovereignty as an end run to gun confiscation?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddQvhdCyhe4
Our President apparently intends to sign this treaty in December to help combat global warming. Problem is, the treaty goes well beyond simple carbon exchanges. It discusses a move toward a "gobal government" with, I understand, no voting our public comment being considered.
Does anyone see the loss of sovereignty as an end run to gun confiscation?