Aston-Johnson Holster Pistol

Status
Not open for further replies.

mec

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
4,588
1842 saw widespread adoption of percussion long arms and handguns across the western world. Britain fielded the percussion Tower pistol and the British East India Company put a near identical arm into service.
1942johnsonwood1.jpg


The .54†Aston-Johnson pistol was a caplock version of the flintlock dragoon pistol of 1837. The practice of the day was to equip mounted troops with a carbine and two large holster pistols slung in closed holsters on either side of the saddle. The initial orders, filled by the H. Aston Company totaled about 34,000 by 1850. Johnson formed a separate company and received an order for 10,000 pistols between 1853-55. An additional 1,000 were produced by the Palmetto Armory late in the series. The pistols are very robust in construction with brass barrel ban, side furniture and a heavy brass butt that was frequently used as a club after the arm was discharged. They were commonly loaded with a single ball or a combination of the .54†ball and several smaller shot- the “buck and ball†loading. They bear a close resemblance to the British pistols-which were bored for larger, 60 to 70 caliber balls.

There are very few modern copies of this general type of pistol. A few Tower/Brit East India Company models are sold- generally without the nipple channel completely bored and fitted with fake solid nipples so that they can be sold on e-bay. The best option for shooting appeared to be an original.

It is not difficult to find examples of this pistol in very fine condition. Many will have cracks in the stock behind the inletting for the lock. This can stem from use of heavy charges or employing the pistol as a club. We examined several before finding an example without a crack in the stock and in near-new mechanical condition.

The pistol bears Johnson markings and is dated 1855. The internal lock work retains the fire blue finish on the tumbler and screws and the rest of the lock plate and components, although a century and a half in the gun, appear factory-new.
johnsonlock4.jpg


Shooting the Aston-Johnson
The pistol has a very heavy trigger pull with every indication that it was standard for the arm. There is a front blade sight with no rear notch and the shooter is obliged to line up on the target as best he can. We were able to index the blade with the back strap screw and hit reasonably well. Our first session consisted of five shots from fifty- feet with Bates firing the first three two-handed standing and Cumpston firing the last two rounds single handed. The entire group was within 4 inches, very well centered on the torso of a Texas Police silhouette target. Subsequent groups fired by each shooter under the same conditions measured more like one foot in diameter. A single load of Buck and 4 balls fired from fifty feet hit center and covered about a one- foot circle within the silhouette.
johnsontarg.jpg


In deference to the age of the pistol and the known weakness of extensively inlayed side lock pistol stocks, we stayed with a period-typical loading of 30 grains of Goex FFG powder set off by a modern musket cap. The resulting one hundred and forty- seven foot pounds of energy is hardly impressive by modern cartridge standards – or even those of the 19th Century Caplock revolvers. It falls right between the factory loaded .32 Smith and Wesson Long 98 grain Lead Round Nose load and the light 148 grain wadcutter loading of the .38 Special. 112 foot pounds and 187 foot pounds respectively. Even so, it would not be at all surprising to find the Aston Johnson much more decisive in the stopping power department because of the massive cross-section of the 230-grain lead ball.

The Aston-Johnson Pistol saw extensive service in the Mexican War of 1845-48 and in the western expansion of the United States into territories ceded by Mexico directly there after. By 1855 the Colt USMR holster revolvers were well on the way to replacing this design.
 
I bought one of these last Summer in Gettysburg. Mine is stamped IN Johnson, Middleton Conn. Were these carried in saddle thimbles or in some other sort of holster? I never saw any belt or sash holsters for it. That .54 Cal. ball carries quite a load. Kind of like a slow moving freight train. The buck and ball loads would be effective at close quarters.
 
This one is marked the same way. That 30 grain charge of ffg was giving it 537 fps.

I believe they were carried on the saddle in closed holsters like the ones used with the Colt dragoons.
 
The Model 1842 was an excellent pistol and well liked by the troops, but by that time the revolver had begun to capture the interest of military men.

The Model 1842 was the updated (percussion) version of the Model 1836; the major other differences being that the furniture of the Model 1836 was iron, while the Model 1842 used brass.

Here, assuming things work, is a Model 1836. The markings are R. JOHNSON/MIDDn CONN/1844. Between them, Johnson and Asa Waters made 41,000 Model 1836 pistols.

Jim
 

Attachments

  • M1836.jpg
    M1836.jpg
    17.7 KB · Views: 22
I've read that they were very happy with that pistol-flint lock and all, even though it stayed in service long after the percussion cap was in major use. Interesting that the percussion one has "Steel" written on the barrel. Of'course as far as anybody can tell any Iron somebody has used to make something is "steel."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top