Black Majik
Member
A few come to mind for me.
SA XD/HS2000: I'm starting to love polymer pistols, particularly HK and Glock, but the XD is something I never clicked with. It points fine,shoots fine, but theres just something I don't care for. Fo a point and click gun, the Glock fills that niche for me. It's a heavy sucker for a polymer pistol too, the thing is really front heavy.
S&W Autos: With all the other great platforms out there, I never warmed up to the S&W Autos. They look cool admittedly, but when I went to hold one out of curiousity, it didn't feel very refined.
Kahr: I LOVE to concept of a PM9, but reports of non-metal reinforced polymer frames, I can't chance it at a gun that costs more than a Glock but less value than a G-lock.
Taurus: I view them as the clone company. They copy all the good designs out there innovated by other companies. The PT92, PT1911, etc... no thanks. I rather get the real thing
CZ: This may be surprising since I'm pretty open to good platforms, but for some reason the CZ line never sparked my interest. I think they're fantastic pistols, but the urge to buy one never came. I shoot them OK, but I have other platforms I prefer.
Makarov: Cool little pistol, built like a tank, but kinda unrefined. Gotta pass.
Ruger Autos: Ugly, clunky, unrefined, brute. It's not that I can't warm up to it, I'm not even gonna try with a Ruger pistol. Again, other platforms I'd MUCH rather have than anything Ruger offers for their centerfire line. I might pick up a MKII/III someday, those are cool. Probably the platform it's safe to say I'll never own.
Steyr: The trapezoid sights are NOT an innovation. I scratched my head wonder *** the engineers were thinking when they decided to put those sights on the pistol.
SA XD/HS2000: I'm starting to love polymer pistols, particularly HK and Glock, but the XD is something I never clicked with. It points fine,shoots fine, but theres just something I don't care for. Fo a point and click gun, the Glock fills that niche for me. It's a heavy sucker for a polymer pistol too, the thing is really front heavy.
S&W Autos: With all the other great platforms out there, I never warmed up to the S&W Autos. They look cool admittedly, but when I went to hold one out of curiousity, it didn't feel very refined.
Kahr: I LOVE to concept of a PM9, but reports of non-metal reinforced polymer frames, I can't chance it at a gun that costs more than a Glock but less value than a G-lock.
Taurus: I view them as the clone company. They copy all the good designs out there innovated by other companies. The PT92, PT1911, etc... no thanks. I rather get the real thing
CZ: This may be surprising since I'm pretty open to good platforms, but for some reason the CZ line never sparked my interest. I think they're fantastic pistols, but the urge to buy one never came. I shoot them OK, but I have other platforms I prefer.
Makarov: Cool little pistol, built like a tank, but kinda unrefined. Gotta pass.
Ruger Autos: Ugly, clunky, unrefined, brute. It's not that I can't warm up to it, I'm not even gonna try with a Ruger pistol. Again, other platforms I'd MUCH rather have than anything Ruger offers for their centerfire line. I might pick up a MKII/III someday, those are cool. Probably the platform it's safe to say I'll never own.
Steyr: The trapezoid sights are NOT an innovation. I scratched my head wonder *** the engineers were thinking when they decided to put those sights on the pistol.
