Ban Assault Clips (New Brady Campaign Vid) comment alternative

Status
Not open for further replies.
While there may be another thread on the Brady BS, this idea to thwart their closing comments is a good idea.
 
Last edited:
What do you want to bet that 99.99% of the people that actually see this video are either anti-gun activists or pro-gun activists. None of the fence sitters will see it.
 
Wow, don't think I've ever seen anything like that. That's some hardcore, misinformed, fear-based propaganda. Good call reposting with the ability to leave comments.

Angry face, evil black gun, target with pony tails, only rapid fire. That's an image straight out of the mind of someone who has never been to a range. The reality of the commercial is ridiculously flawed though, I mean look at his grip even.

The good news is if they ban assault clips, nothing that actually exists will have been banned.
 
this was my response to that video.

The Brandy Campaign is a sick organisation showing girls and school kids as target silhouette in their anti-constitutional commercials. No gun owner have ever use such targets as their silhouette in my many years of shooting. Only mentally sick people as the Brandy campaign will resource to those disturbing images to promote FEAR and PANIC without respect for the victims, using lies for their own malicious benefis. If you really want to prevent gun violence start promoting gun safety, not lies.
 
Wow, don't think I've ever seen anything like that.
Typical Brady propaganda....they have NEVER let facts get in the way of their agenda, and typically use attempts to "scare' people into supporting them. The Brady Bunch, along with PETA, are terrorist organizations in my book, perpetually attacking a way of life I hold near and dear. On the bright side, attempting to air the ad may be the straw that broke the camel's back, as they are BROKE, and ad sapce....other than Youtube.... isn't cheap, especially in the markets in which such ads would be effective in...
 
*** is an "assault clip" anyway? I like how these fools just create words to promote their anti-gun agenda.

Gee... I always just thought that a magazine with a higher capacity allowed me to shoot for a longer period of time without reloading. I didn't realize that it would force me to kill a bunch of innocent people. I wonder if the Brady Bunch has any idea how quickly a skilled shooter can conduct a magazine change with a 10-rounder?

The term "high capacity magazine" always bothered me, too. A Glock 17 was designed to have a 17-round magazine as a standard feature. During the last AWB this magazine was suddenly treated like a special destructive device that was created by a devious killer with the express purpose of bathing the streets in blood. What a bunch of mindless propaganda.

As Davek already said, the Brady Campaign will never let the truth get in the way of a good story!
 
They are creating their own hysteria, creating a false hidden society in the minds of the sheeple, kinda like the ATF forcing dealers to sell to known bad elements, thus creating "job security" for themselves.

Like the firemen who get caught setting fires.... Why aren't we as a society shutting this down? > delete <
 
Clip and magazines, two totally different critters for sure. Anti's don't sit well with me, they need to recognize they are not God.
 
The Brady Campaign to Promote Gun Violence really showed their true colors having somebody shoot at targets of little kids. Sick.
Honestly, the more I see of these people, the more I realize how very dark and twisted they are.
 
"Psychological projection or projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism where a person unconsciously denies his or her own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, such as to other people. Thus, projection involves imagining or projecting the belief that others have those feelings" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Basically the Brady campaign would slaughter innocent people if given the chance so they think everyone else would too.
 
On paper, a high capacity magazine ban would make sense, if thats what criminals were wanting. They don't care so much about magazine capacity as much as cheap, concealable handguns. The other fact is we need to get rid of 922r so I can import an SVD.
 
On the bright side, attempting to air the ad may be the straw that broke the camel's back
Not to mention the fact that their over-10-round-ban campaign directly threatens a lot of people who don't own "assault weapons" and don't have CHL's, potentially motivating more and more apathetic gun owners into pro-RKBA activism. The majority of full-sized non-.45 pistols designed since 1930 use "assault clips" per the Bradyites...and a lot of people own them.
 
The Bradyites are too clever by half. IMO, they aren't primarily after extended magazines on handguns (which are awkward and unwieldy, despite the isolated incident in Arizona). No, what they're really trying to ban are the standard 20- and 30-round magazines on "Evil Black Rifles." This is really an "Assault Weapons Ban" through the back door -- and this time, they don't intend to allow grandfathering of existing weapons. Face it, the 20- or 30-round magazine is what makes the EBR effective. Otherwise, it's just a glorified Remington Model 7400.
 
How the heck are you supposed to hold your assault pants up if they won't let you have assault clips on your assault suspenders?

An assault person would look pretty silly assaulting with their pants falling down every assault!

rc
 
I mean look at his grip even.

I know, that's a dangerous spot for that thumb... check out the frame at 0:10

This is from the Brady's Facebook page, posted by the Brady moderator in rebuttal to a pro-gun guy named 'Ron' saying assault clip isn't the correct word:
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence: ‎@Ron, Ammunition magazines and clips are common nomenclature for the same thing.

I've noticed that a lot of pro-gun people post on the Brady Campaign's Facebook page. Their comments usually get deleted but I fear that by telling them how 'wrong' they are for using certain terms and pointing out that using these terms reduces their 'credibility' may actually help the Brady's by educating them.
 
Oh Dear Lord....-_-


Honestly...I could say some things that aren't very high road, so I'll keep my trap shut.

Do you think these brady....things(if they think all of us gun owners are psychopathic, reckless murderers, I refuse to call them people), can mess up their own plans so much to push California back out of those archaic gun laws they have?

Reading the replies on the OP's second link....talk about shooting themselves in the foot. Gun control laws aren't needed. There are far more important things on the Government's plate right now. They don't need to try and take away our rights when they can't even agree on a budget plan.

I'm going to stop now....I don't want to fly any further off the handle.

keep up the good fight, until those Brady [censored] pack it in for good.
 
Wow, the young male gun owner is obviously a crack shot!

I don't understand why one of the paper targets has pig tails.
 
i wonder why they disabled comments/ratings? could it be because they realize most americans don't support their position? in any case from my perspective the first step to banning guns is restricting their magazines, and the next step after banning guns is facism.
 
Simply Sarah

Ms. Brady has really outdone herself this time. That video treads the threshold of delusional paranoid psychosis. Do the Brady propagandists hear voices? As one with much-loved daughters and a granddaughter I take this one particularly personally. Is there any such thing as a defamation of character class action suit? Someone needs to put a short leash on that Brady puppy. Whether sane or otherwise we all know the mag ban is merely a means to an end.
 
The Brady Bunch [is a] terrorist organization in my book...

The Brady Campaign is a lot of things: stupid, anti-freedom, anti-gun, anti-self defense, anti-responsibility, ill-informed, factually inaccurate.

But a "terrorist organization" ? Uh, nope. This is the same kind of sentiment being echoed by the left against the Tea Party movement. There's something that comes right before the 2nd Amendment, it's called the 1st Amendment and it allows people to say things, even REALLY STUPID THINGS, without being labeled as terrorists.
 
StrikeFire83 said:
The Brady Campaign is a lot of things: stupid, anti-freedom, anti-gun, anti-self defense, anti-responsibility, ill-informed, factually inaccurate.

But a "terrorist organization" ? Uh, nope. This is the same kind of sentiment being echoed by the left against the Tea Party movement. There's something that comes right before the 2nd Amendment, it's called the 1st Amendment and it allows people to say things, even REALLY STUPID THINGS, without being labeled as terrorists.
Agreed. "Pro-crime" is a more accurate label.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top