I've got one. NOT WORTH THE MONEY!
I'm not big on construction, but those welds are just ugly. Sorry to burst anyone's bubble, but you don't, repeat, don't have to have a bunch of splatter around the bead! You want to be a professional and sell your works, make a clean weld.
The biggest sore point for me is that the stand isn't wide enough to staple an IDPA/ISPC target at the edges. Instead, the firring strips pass through the target area and get shot up pretty quickly. This might not be a problem for master-class shooter that tear out the -0 ring, but start shooting faster than you can or getting less-practiced shooters out there, and you'll be replacing stakes very often. I've probably had to replace one or both stakes a half-dozen times in the year I've had the stand.
I can't speak for the dillon, but I'd be sure to call them and see how wide the stakes are in relation to a standard IDPA/IPSC target. Of course, if you aren't going to use these types of targets, or you are doing precision shooting from a rest, this might not be a concern for you. Either way, I'd look at the Dillon before I looked at the Beast. That's what I'm doing, right now.
Another option, and one I hesitate to propose only for political reasons, is the stand offered by Wilson Combat. From what I saw on their Advanced Shooting video with Ken Hackathorn, it offers a lot of versatility and is very durable. One base and you can add the uppers that suit you best (like a U-loop for an IDPA target or a steel plate holder). It's an idea; don't know what it costs, but it has to be cheaper than buying stakes every few weeks.