Becoming revolver fan in new age of semi-autos

Perhaps if the OP had someone familiar with
his S&W, it could become if not his favorite but definitely equal to the Python.
Actually, I'm sure of it.
The 4” 686 is a fine firearm, but I just never found it comfortable to carry, perhaps if I had 3” 686 it would have been different. I do own OWB high rise holster for 686, but with 4” barrel it just does not feel as comfortable to carry as 3” Python in IWB holster.

What I can say about 686 is that smooth rounded trigger face design is better ergonomically for double action shooting. Python has flat serrated trigger face that is ideal for single action pull. Having said that the actual double action pull on Python is bees knees, or perhaps it got that way after hundreds of rounds down range.

The reason my favorite gun is Python, is that it excels at being carry gun as well as range/target/fun firearm. My other carry weapon, S&W Shield, is a fine carry firearm, and I feel comfortable hitting what I am shooting at, but it is simply not as accurate in my hands as the Python, especially at ranges past 10 yards.
 
One thing to consider about a new Python and S&Ws, the S&Ws
have differeent levels of production. Those include the standard
fare, Pro Series and Performance Center, the latter guns approaching
the Colt'Python prices.

A buyer may find the S&W levels of production still fail in comparison
with Colt's. Judgments might well differ, especially depending on
one's level of double action expertise.

Having had limited experience in shooting the new Pythons, I still
favor the S&Ws.
 
What I can say about 686 is that smooth rounded trigger face design is better ergonomically for double action shooting. Python has flat serrated trigger face that is ideal for single action pull
I was surprised at how squared-off and sharp the new Python trigger is. No way I could shoot more than a few rounds with that before I broke out the dremel. I have my triggers on my 686s radiused and polished.

One thing to consider about a new Python and S&Ws, the S&Ws
have differeent levels of production. Those include the standard
fare, Pro Series and Performance Center, the latter guns approaching
the Colt'Python prices.

A buyer may find the S&W levels of production still fail in comparison
with Colt's. Judgments might well differ, especially depending on
one's level of double action expertise.

The latter might be approaching Python prices, but from what I've seen in the last few years, S&W Pro and PC guns get little (if any) extra TLC - they're just configurations not offered in their standard lineup. That said, S&Ws are pretty easy to tune, and a good DA trigger is pretty achievable. Every once in a while, you get a rare factory gem as well. Check out my "coin-on-the-barrel" Utube vids ;) .
 
No reason to dislike revolvers.

99.999% of those of us who have to pay for our sidearms with our own money are simply hobbyists.

The other 0.001% of buyers are buying lots of guns in some professional capacity, and are driven by the LOWEST BID in their decision.

I carry a little bitty autopistol in my pocket most days. It works real good for what I ask it to do. Its smaller than a J-frame revolver. That's why I carry it. It actually conceals completely in the watch-pocket of my Grand-Dad Jeans.

I'm not even sure how many revolvers I own.
Several at least.

I don't currently compete with handguns. Most competitions have rules that favor semi-autos. Even old-fashioned Camp Perry bullseye pistol matches. So I guess if you care about winning some shooting contest, you shoot whatever makes winning easiest. Probably a 24-shot 9mm for anything that requires you to pre-register through Practiscore. I'll even admit to owning a 33-shot 9mm magazine. Maybe more than one. I don't think I've shot 'em yet though. Might get around to it. And last I checked, two 17-round magazines is 34 rounds. That's more than 33 rounds. What did I win?

I prefer shooting revolvers for fun. I'm old. I don't have to bend over to pick up my brass when I shoot revolvers, and the brass doesn't land in the mud or get stepped on by my buddies. I just need to break myself of the habit of scrounging all the stepped-on and muddy brass that others leave behind. My wife says if I bring any more brass home, she's gonna have me committed. I don't need more brass, but yet...

I'm just shooting at targets. Slowly. I wish all the best to the quick-draw guys. "Splits" and such. I hear they even have contests these days to see how fast you can reload a shotgun. And magazine-tubes that stick out past the end of the barrel. Automatics of course. And why?... Because the guys that wrote the rules set up the rules to make it that way. Alright. That's fine. I'm just not real interested in it. Not at this point.
 
No way I could shoot more than a few rounds with that before I broke out the dremel. I have my triggers on my 686s radiused and polished.
You would be surprised, shot hundreds of rounds and no issues. It’s all a matter of practice really. Playing acoustic guitar (yeah, I do that) mauls your fingers pretty bad. After some time you just do it.
 
You would be surprised, shot hundreds of rounds and no issues. It’s all a matter of practice really. Playing acoustic guitar (yeah, I do that) mauls your fingers pretty bad. After some time you just do it.
Uh huh, and after a time even self flagellation is something you just do. o_O :oops:
 
No Offense to the OP…

But anybody else think the New Colt Python is not cool anymore because EVERYONE and their grandma got one now?

Colt did a good job marketing this gun.
Colt did a great job on marketing and upping the quality of it , but I still would take a S&W 586/686 over the python, I would even take a Taurus or the new Rossi but I like being the guy on the range with something different.
 
Colt did a great job on marketing and upping the quality of it , but I still would take a S&W 586/686 over the python, I would even take a Taurus or the new Rossi but I like being the guy on the range with something different.
100%! Great Marketing
 
I started shooting a revolver for USPSA matches back in the 70s and never lost interest in them. I find that at that time, having only six shots made me concentrate more on making my hits. After a while I was beating the bottom feeders. All stages were 6 shot neutral back then.

Today the automatics have a large advantage do to the extra capacity and the fact that stages are more designed for the autos.

I shoot against myself. I still shoot Steel Challenge with my revolver and was a Master Class shooter until recently. I'm a B class now and shooting from a wheelchair but it's still my 617 revolver that I take to most matches. I love it when I beat an auto shooter.

Take your time, learn to control the trigger and then get faster as time goes by. Remember it's supposed to be FUN!

Steven
 
I was the other way; a revolver fan (still am!) but eventually became a fan of some semiauto handguns. Since I'm also a S&W fan and I love metal frames, I have old S&W semiauto handguns, and S&W revolvers. I do have other revolvers, and semiautos, but mostly Smiths. Model 39, 59, and 745.
 
I have plenty of semiautos and they're okay, but a revolver always feels better in my hand. Maybe because I've been shooting revolvers since I was a teen?

Out of my many handguns, I keep a revolver as a nightstand gun. I shoot them better and feel more comfortable with them. I prefer to carry a snub 38 as well.
 
I decided to read up on proper techniques and watch number of in-depth training videos specific to double action revolvers. I was doing a lot of things wrong prior to learning about the new platform, but I picked up a few things, especially how to properly shoot it double action only and properly reload it. I started to really like using revolver, and it started to get most time at the range

I prefer shooting revolvers for fun. I'm old. I don't have to bend over to pick up my brass when I shoot revolvers, and the brass doesn't land in the mud or get stepped on by my buddies...

I'm just shooting at targets. Slowly. I wish all the best to the quick-draw guys

I should say up front that the best way to shoot is the way that gives you the most enjoyment. That being said, the OP suggested they're interested in multiple aspects of revolver shooting, which I think is a worthy goal. For one wanting to run the revolver well, marksmanship, speed, and gun handling skills are all part of the revolver experience: It's my opinion that the complete wheelgunner shouldn't have major holes in their repertoire - they would, for example, be able to shoot a decent 25-yard 5-shot double action slow-fire group on demand, and execute a speedy and clean El Prez drill. The well-rounded wheelgunner doesn't get dispensation from picking up their brass from the ground, either ;) .

I am a big revolver fan with the emphasis on BIG.

You need an IWB holster and some speedloaders to go with your BFR...:p
 
Last edited:
I don't think I ever was a semi auto pistol guy even when my firearm interest was based on video games and some movies. I always for some reason gravitated to revolvers and as I came to learn how version they are with different cartridges and some revolvers being able to shoot several, that appealed to me.

Then once I started shooting, the feel and accuracy of revolvers cemented my preference for them. Revolvers generally pack more punch for a caliber than a semi auto in the same caliber, making calibers like .32 become sufficient for self defense.

Maybe the reload isn't as fast as a semi, but that's a trade I'm willing to make for the better gun.
 
My initial interest in handguns was driven by being a history buff, from a very young age, with a particular interest in US history, post-Civil War, and 20th Century world history. I became a legal adult in 1979, when the 1911 was still the standard sidearm of the US military. 1911 pistols were also somewhat popular duty pistol choices among the serious shooters, among sheriff’s deputies working in my county of residence, and among police officers in the largest city in the region, plus, of course, seemed to be the leading choice among Texas Rangers. I did not dislike revolvers, but, thought that revolvers were quaint. Having grown up in a household without firearms, and with my local relatives owning only long guns, there was no family tradition to influence my concept of what a handgun “should be.” So, in late 1982 or early 1983, when I was 21, I bought a 1911. I started aspiring to add such pistols as the Browning Hi-Power, Walthers PPK, PP, P1, and P5, HK P7, and classic SIGs.

Then, however, in late 1983, I was hired by the Houston (Texas) Police Department. (Yes, other states do have their own Houstons.) I learned that I would have to train with an S&W L-Frame, in the academy, and that for my first year of street duty, would have to carry only DA revolvers, 24/7/365, as my only handguns. (There was also a short list of approved shotguns, too.) The USA was in a recession, but, the oil industry was still thriving, so, Houston was a wild-‘n’-wooly oil boom town, attracting the unemployed from across the USA. Plus, civil wars in Latin American were driving an increased migration from the southern border. Houston PD had been tending to loose several officers per year, killed in the line of duty. I knew that I needed to TRAIN, diligently, with the weapons I would be required to carry. So, I did, and found the rhythmic nature of shooting DA revolvers to be a thing of beauty.

I became eligible to carry auto-loading pistols after I completed one year of sworn service, but mostly used revolvers as primary duty pistols until 1990, when I had finally managed to successfully acquire and vet a Colt Commander that was truly reliable. I continued to use revolvers as back-up/secondary weapons, but the Commander was my 24/7 gun. When that Commander started choking, after about a year, I quickly switched to a SIG P220, which was my 24/7 gun. The P220’s heel-clip magazine release tended to snag the fabric of patrol car seat cushions, causing a partial release of the mag, so, I reverted to revolvers in my duty holster, from 1993 to 1997. In 1997, a duty handgun policy change was announced, that compelled me to make a final duty pistol choice. Future duty pistols choices would much more limited. I chose to “grandfather” my Colt Government Model, which had been proven reliable, plus I quickly bought, and vetted, two Kimbers, to qual with them, before the deadline. (The sad saga of those Kimbers‘ reliability problems would make this post too long to tolerate.)

Multiple revolvers have remained favored personal-time carry guns, which has continued into retirement, which started six years ago. I do not have a “rotation,” because there is no regularity or pattern. My usual daily carry gun is a 2” S&W Model 64, .38 Special, but for random reasons, the role might go to a 2.25” or 3” SP101, or a 3” or 4” GP100. It is normal for me to add a second gun. When I opt for a Glock or 1911, it is usually when I carry two handguns. Notice that I did not use the terms “primary, secondary, or back-up” gun. I am still likely to reflexively reach for my right hip, in a defensive emergency. If I am wearing a full-cut, voluminous cover garment, the handgun at 0300 might be a full-sized 1911, or a Glock G17. In skimpier clothing, the handgun at 0300 is probably going to be a revolver, but a Glock may be positioned elsewhere, probably for a lefty draw. I write lefty, and throw righty, so, the main thing “weak” about either hand is that my right hand and right shoulder are not aging as well as my left hand and left shoulder.

So, I like auto-loading pistols, and, I like revolving pistols, for carry. Talking about what like to collect, and/or use recreationally, would require a much longer post. This one is too long, already.

Life is good. ;)
 
Last edited:
I should say up front that the best way to shoot is the way that gives you the most enjoyment. That being said, the OP suggested they're interested in multiple aspects of revolver shooting, which I think is a worthy goal. For one wanting to run the revolver well, marksmanship, speed, and gun handling skills are all part of the revolver experience: It's my opinion that the complete wheelgunner shouldn't have major holes in their repertoire - they would, for example, be able to shoot a decent 25-yard 5-shot double action slow-fire group on demand, and execute a speedy and clean El Prez drill. The well-rounded wheelgunner doesn't get dispensation from picking up their brass from the ground, either ;) .



You need an IWB holster and some speedloaders to go with your BFR...:p
I will shoot my knee off.
 
I should say up front that the best way to shoot is the way that gives you the most enjoyment. That being said, the OP suggested they're interested in multiple aspects of revolver shooting, which I think is a worthy goal. For one wanting to run the revolver well, marksmanship, speed, and gun handling skills are all part of the revolver experience: It's my opinion that the complete wheelgunner shouldn't have major holes in their repertoire - they would, for example, be able to shoot a decent 25-yard 5-shot double action slow-fire group on demand, and execute a speedy and clean El Prez drill. The well-rounded wheelgunner doesn't get dispensation from picking up their brass from the ground, either ;) .



You need an IWB holster and some speedloaders to go with your BFR...:p
10 rounds at 75 yards with the BFR loaded with 46 grains of H110 and a 350 grain berrys.
150Target.jpg
 
You know, without some sort of size reference, this target might as well be the size of a barn, also does your BFR have bipods and optics? 75 yards is a bit far for the revolvers I have handled.
The red is 6" the orange is .5" and the green is 7".
 
Going by the size of the holes, the red circle looks to be about 6 inches across. Good question about bipod and optics.
Iron sights only about 30 seconds between rounds no other support other than my 2 hands. At 69 I still have 20/20 vision and 75 yards is about the best I can do without support. 50 yards I can group them a lot tighter. Post 38 shows my BFR iron sights.
 
Last edited:
I really like that three inch Python. I would like to have one with the Wilson rear sight.

Perhaps I could conceal one OWB with the right outer garment, but there is no way that I could conceal it with normal dress, nor would I want to carry around that much wieith all day. Also, for CCW I want more capacity.

I believe that Mas Ayoob carried an original three inch Python in police service at one time..
 
@Rival; very cool! Those are great revolvers that can do triple duty as fun-range guns, home or street self defense as well as hunting chores if pressed. :thumbup:

Glad to see someone somewhat mewer to the hobby who is wanting to expand their handgun horizons. Successful DA revolver shooting is an art that carries over into better all around handgunning, so the more you practice and improve with your 686 and python, the better you will shoot other handguns, too.

Stay safe.
 
Back
Top