Roc_my_tims
Member
Prices are different in every state. But is a rem 700 out of the $600 range now?
Savage 110 was my first centerfire rifle (30-06). It was accurate, but the lock time was a bit long, and the bolt was a bit sloppy. Remington actions have been very accurate over the years and even the cheaper models are quite good. Newer, fancy actions are well-made and the market is flooded with great actions these days.I’m a bit bias and will say Savage 110 only because that’s all I own and they outshoot me.
Primarily changing from the more traditional large single piece striker pin spring to the smaller two piece springs and ultralight striker of the Axis.Loon, as a relatively new ( last two years or so ) 110 shooter, I`m curious as to " the recent changes " to the 110 line with which you are " less than thrilled ". Thanks.
Small port receivers are not my favorite at my bench for single loading. Not a savage axis fan at all. But some how I've ended up with a .223 pink camo, .243 with cabelas camo, two .308 from Walmart. All on sale with rebate. One wood stock 30 06 for testing garand ammo. All shoot way better that I figured for me and the grandkids. The 30 06 and the .243 are true sub moa rifles. None have ever had store bought ammo touch them. All make strong dimples in every primer as I'm a habitual primer inspector. That's personal experience not something I've read. When ever I pass info it's always what I've done or experienced my self. Any mass produced rifle purchase is luck of the draw. When a cheep firearm shoots better than my custom model 70 or some I've assembled it's sorta funny.Primarily changing from the more traditional large single piece striker pin spring to the smaller two piece springs and ultralight striker of the Axis.
Its not necessarily a bad system, but ive read enough instances of miss fires in the axis to not be thrilled with them being used in the 110.
It does have the advantage of reducing the bolt lift to being similar to other designs now tho....but again at the expense of stored energy.
Im also not a huge fan of some of the 110s having smaller ports, tho it dosent seem to be universal. Friend if mine has a .308 with a small port that works well enough, but now suffers from the same issues all the other little port guns do....one of the things i liked about the savage 110 is the actions were long and open.
This is just my opinion of course, and if a someone's happy with the 110 they have or are looking at i dont think they are a BAD choice.
Thank you, sir.Primarily changing from the more traditional large single piece striker pin spring to the smaller two piece springs and ultralight striker of the Axis.
Its not necessarily a bad system, but ive read enough instances of miss fires in the axis to not be thrilled with them being used in the 110.
It does have the advantage of reducing the bolt lift to being similar to other designs now tho....but again at the expense of stored energy.
Im also not a huge fan of some of the 110s having smaller ports, tho it dosent seem to be universal. Friend if mine has a .308 with a small port that works well enough, but now suffers from the same issues all the other little port guns do....one of the things i liked about the savage 110 is the actions were long and open.
This is just my opinion of course, and if a someone's happy with the 110 they have or are looking at i dont think they are a BAD choice.
Ive had a dozen or so savages all but the newest being the older designs, and worked on 3 or 4 Axis.Small port receivers are not my favorite at my bench for single loading. Not a savage axis fan at all. But some how I've ended up with a .223 pink camo, .243 with cabelas camo, two .308 from Walmart. All on sale with rebate. One wood stock 30 06 for testing garand ammo. All shoot way better that I figured for me and the grandkids. The 30 06 and the .243 are true sub moa rifles. None have ever had store bought ammo touch them. All make strong dimples in every primer as I'm a habitual primer inspector. That's personal experience not something I've read. When ever I pass info it's always what I've done or experienced my self. Any mass produced rifle purchase is luck of the draw. When a cheep firearm shoots better than my custom model 70 or some I've assembled it's sorta funny.
Very welcome!Thank you, sir.
5-600 here for an ADL.Prices are different in every state. But is a rem 700 out of the $600 range now?
TurkishI havent gotten them in yet, but ive ordered both a Stevens 334 and an ATA Turqua (same rifle basically). Both can be had under 500, and so far they seem like they may offer some upscale feel, as well as solid functioning, at a low price point.
As I havent gotten mine yet, i cant say for sure.
RIGHT now (knowing what i do) if i were talking sub 500, id probably suggest a
Mossberg Patriot, Ruger Predator, or Rem 783.
I believe theres some 110s under 500 also, but im less than thrilled with the recent changes to the series, so nit 100% sure id be willing to recommend them right now.
YepTurkish
I second this. I had two different patriots that both shot very well especially for their price! I culled down calibers so I sold them off. Their walnut is actually pretty good quality IMHO. And I was impressed with the strata camo synthetic stock as well. Good all around hunting rifles!You could also try a Mossberg 308, there are several rifles that fall into your price range. You could try buying used, check out some of the pawn shops or a Cabelas.
The Ruger American, hands down!Well my son wants a bolt action and is dying for a 308. If this will get him into guns and respect them versus behind a controller and video game then I'm all for it.
We went to Academy today, I was under the impression the Ruger Ranch was offered in 308 but it wasn't. He held the Ruger Predator and liked it but it was $499. I wanted to ask you guys if there was better options out there for around the same price.
The only thing it needs to be is around 6.5lbs, 20 inch barrel or less, and threaded (doesn't HAVE to be threaded but he wants a brake on it).
Savage= always accurate right out of the box. Good choice.I’m a bit bias and will say Savage 110 only because that’s all I own and they outshoot me.
The one I shot had a great trigger that broke like glass.Although the rebate and great Euro-Optic sale is over, you can still get a CZ600 Alpha for under $600. (Sale and rebate put it at under $400 delivered).
It checks most of your boxes. The trigger is very, very good. I've only shot mine with 150NBT reloads that I have left over from my FAL and it's sub MOA with those. It comes with a .75MOA accuracy guarantee (with match ammo) and I think it will do it easily.
I'm curious to see how you like the Turkish Savage/Stevens gun. It's not designed like the traditional Savage/Stevens.I havent gotten them in yet, but ive ordered both a Stevens 334 and an ATA Turqua (same rifle basically). Both can be had under 500, and so far they seem like they may offer some upscale feel, as well as solid functioning, at a low price point.
As I havent gotten mine yet, i cant say for sure.
RIGHT now (knowing what i do) if i were talking sub 500, id probably suggest a
Mossberg Patriot, Ruger Predator, or Rem 783.
I believe theres some 110s under 500 also, but im less than thrilled with the recent changes to the series, so nit 100% sure id be willing to recommend them right now.
They're also reliable and tough since they re-designed the detachable magazine.
Thomas...Will the new mags fit the older American guns? I have read a lot of bad about the mags on the older American models like the mags spreading open if left loaded for a long time.
Part of the reason for me asking is because of all the negative reviews on the "New" Ruger mags. And the reviews on the Ruger mags is what caused me to buy a Savage 243 instead of another Ruger American rifle. The only Ruger American I would consider would be one of the Ranch Rifles that take the Mini 30 mag or takes the Ar-15 mags. Read the reviews.
Yep good advice. I gave the Ruger 243 to my son and I was hoping to get him at least one spare mag to go with the gun. Now I am not sure if its worth the risk to buy one of the redesigned mags and the original mags apparently aren't offered anymore. Frankly I do not like detachable mags. I like mags built right into the gun like has been done for decades. Detachable mags are just a cost cutting measure for the gun maker at the expense of the purchaser.Thomas...
I got a grandson an American 243 from WallyWorld eight years ago and gave him a second magazine two years ago. He tends to fill them up and let them sit, one in the gun and one in a drawer. We have had not one problem with them.
The easy solution is don't fill a magazine up and let it sit around. I can't see where having two in the magazine if you wanted it loaded would cause any problem.
Ruger standardised on the AICS (effectively the Gen2s are gussied up preds) for the short actions.Will the new mags fit the older American guns? I have read a lot of bad about the mags on the older American models like the mags spreading open if left loaded for a long time.
Part of the reason for me asking is because of all the negative reviews on the "New" Ruger mags. And the reviews on the Ruger mags is what caused me to buy a Savage 243 instead of another Ruger American rifle. The only Ruger American I would consider would be one of the Ranch Rifles that take the Mini 30 mag or takes the Ar-15 mags. Read the reviews.
Prices are different in every state. But is a rem 700 out of the $600 range now?
If your enough of a shooter to hand load, I'd look for a platform that uses prefit barrels. The savages are easy swaps and the rem 700 takes a Ramage modification easily. That only limits you to short action cartridges and that's not hugely limiting.I'm going to hand load them and will start out with some varmint projectiles and some light loads of fast powder. Then he can tell me when he wants more...